Imagen de Portada

Extended Reality in Nursing Professional Development: A Scoping Review of Continuing Education Applications for Practicing Nurses

Guardado en:
Publicado en:The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing vol. 56, no. 12 (Dec 2025), p. 505-538
Autor principal: Mayer, Jennifer E
Otros Autores: Lebedko, Sophia, Lee, Catherine, Sferrazza, Natalie M, Booth, Richard
Publicado:
SLACK INCORPORATED
Materias:
Canada
South Korea
United States > US
Taiwan
Emergency medical care
Software
Nursing education
Continuing education
Professional development
Virtual reality
Nurses
Skills
Teaching hospitals
Clinical trials
Evidence-based nursing
Design
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
Intervention
Infrastructure
Learning Modalities
Hospitals
Competence
Achievement Tests
Experiential Learning
Control Groups
Influence of Technology
Experimental Groups
Educational Technology
Cognitive Style
Nursing Students
Meta Analysis
Medical Evaluation
Novices
Information Seeking
Computer Software Reviews
Evidence Based Practice
Feasibility Studies
Problem Solving
Educational Environment
Database Management Systems
Computer Software
Barriers
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Resumen:Background: Extended reality (XR), encompassing virtual, augmented, and mixed reality, creates immersive educational environments that connect theory with practice, and it is increasingly used in continuing professional development. This scoping review examines current literature on XR technologies for nursing professional development. Method: Literature published between January 2022 and March 2025 was synthesized from the MEDLINE, Scopus, and CINAHL databases. Results: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, spanning 10 countries, with sample sizes ranging from seven to 1,868 nurses. Virtual reality was the predominant modality (84% of interventions), mostly in hospital settings. Five primary themes emerged: (1) learning outcomes and educational effectiveness, (2) technical and implementation challenges, (3) realism and fidelity considerations, (4) specialized clinical applications, and (5) user experience and engagement. Conclusion: Interventions that used XR improved clinical knowledge, confidence, and procedural skills, with some studies reporting advantages over traditional methods, despite challenges such as cybersickness, infrastructure limits, financial constraints, and limited haptic feedback.
ISSN:0022-0124
1938-2472
DOI:10.3928/00220124-20251001-02
Fuente:Health & Medical Collection