Manifestations of computational thinking practices on preservice mathematics teachers’ pen-and-paper problem-solving
Збережено в:
| Опубліковано в:: | Pythagoras vol. 46, no. 1 (2025) |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Опубліковано: |
AOSIS (Pty) Ltd
|
| Предмети: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Теги: |
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Короткий огляд: | The development of computational thinking has been declared a necessity for everyone in the current digital era. Most studies dedicated to the development of computational thinking have focused on using plugged activities. However, in developing countries like South Africa, most schools struggle with resource provision which can inhibit the integration of computational thinking in all learners. This article considers an alternative approach to computational thinking in mathematics education using pen-and-paper problem-solving. Through the adoption of exploratory qualitative research with a purposeful sample of five preservice teachers, the manifestation of computational thinking in pen-and-paper problem-solving is explored. Adopting the combination of the metacognitive framework and Schoenfeld’s framework for problem-solving, this study explains from the perspectives of preservice teachers how computational thinking practices manifest in pen-and-paper problem-solving. The thematic analysis conducted in this study revealed that computational thinking practices such as ion, decomposition and algorithmic thinking, and evaluation were observed in preservice teachers’ pen-and-paper problem-solving. Two interesting findings emerged from this study: (1) there was no discernible difference between decomposition and algorithmic thinking in preservice teachers’ pen-and-paper problem-solving, and (2) there was no clear evidence of pattern recognition as an important computational thinking practice in preservice teachers’ pen-and-paper problem-solving.Contribution:The first finding indicates that during pen-and-paper problem-solving, it might be difficult to differentiate between decomposition and algorithmic thinking. The second finding indicates that more studies need to be conducted, directed towards how pattern recognition manifest in pen-and-paper problem-solving. Conclusions and recommendations are made for this study. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1012-2346 2223-7895 |
| DOI: | 10.4102/pythagoras.v46i1.855 |
| Джерело: | Engineering Database |