Tattooed Workers: The Nature of the Tattoo Matters for Observer Perceptions and Treatment of Tattooed Colleagues

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (2025)
Autor principal: Grocutt, Alyssa
Publicado:
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3283374415
003 UK-CbPIL
020 |a 9798270206086 
035 |a 3283374415 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 66569  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Grocutt, Alyssa 
245 1 |a Tattooed Workers: The Nature of the Tattoo Matters for Observer Perceptions and Treatment of Tattooed Colleagues 
260 |b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses  |c 2025 
513 |a Dissertation/Thesis 
520 3 |a In this dissertation, I examined observer perceptions and treatment of tattooed colleagues based on tattoo content. Guided by expectancy violations theory, I predicted dark tattoo content (e.g., intimidating) would elicit negative perceptions, namely lower competence, trustworthiness, artisticness, and higher riskiness, and subsequently greater negative treatment towards colleagues with dark tattoos. In contrast, I proposed light tattoo content (e.g., friendly) would elicit positive perceptions, namely higher competence, trustworthiness, artisticness, and lower riskiness, and subsequently greater positive treatment towards colleagues with light tattoos.Study 1 was an experimental vignette study manipulating tattoo content, hierarchical position, and gender. Tattoo-specific stereotypes, i.e., perceived artisticness and riskiness, were significant outcomes of tattoo content, and mediated the indirect effects of dark tattoo content on subtle discrimination. In addition, hierarchical position moderated the indirect effect of dark tattoo content on subtle discrimination through perceived artisticness, namely this was significant when the tattooed colleague was a coworker or supervisor, but not a supervisor’s supervisor.Study 2 was another experimental vignette study where I manipulated tattoo-specific stereotypes and measured outcomes to enhance causal inferences about the indirect effects model of tattoo content on treatment toward tattooed colleagues through tattoo-specific stereotypes (i.e., perceived riskiness and artisticness). Results showed significant direct effects of perceived riskiness on all outcomes.Study 3 was a field survey with employees who had a tattooed colleague. Results replicated for the indirect effects of dark tattoo content on negative treatment towards tattooed colleagues through tattoo-specific stereotypes of perceived riskiness and artisticness. Also, the indirect effects of light tattoo content on positive treatment towards tattoo colleagues through all stereotypes were significant. Hierarchical position moderated the indirect effects of light tattoo content on positive treatment through perceived riskiness; this was significant when the tattooed colleague was a coworker or employee/follower, but not a supervisor or manager.Three key takeaways: (1) the tattoo content matters, (2) tattoo-specific stereotypes explain the effects of tattoo content on treatment of tattooed colleagues, and (3) stereotypes elicited in the observer matter, because the same tattoo can be perceived as a sign of artisticness and riskiness, with each differentially affecting subsequent treatment of tattooed colleagues. 
653 |a Hiring 
653 |a Tattoos 
653 |a Mediators 
653 |a Hospitality industry 
653 |a Gender 
653 |a Stigma 
653 |a Ethics 
653 |a Applicants 
653 |a 20th century 
653 |a American culture 
653 |a Ostracism 
653 |a Native peoples 
653 |a Employees 
653 |a Mediation 
653 |a Design 
653 |a Sociology 
653 |a Archaeology 
653 |a Inscriptions 
653 |a Social psychology 
653 |a Alternative dispute resolution 
653 |a Hospitality leisure & tourism studies 
653 |a Native studies 
653 |a Management 
773 0 |t ProQuest Dissertations and Theses  |g (2025) 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3283374415/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3283374415/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch