Artificial Intelligence and the Future of International Law and Power *

Shranjeno v:
Bibliografske podrobnosti
izdano v:Journal of World Sociopolitical Studies vol. 9, no. 4 (Autumn 2025), p. 923-959
Glavni avtor: Salehi, Karim
Drugi avtorji: Khiyaban, Simin Habib Zadeh, Sabbar, Shoaib
Izdano:
University of Tehran, Faculty of World Studies
Teme:
Online dostop:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Oznake: Označite
Brez oznak, prvi označite!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3285780397
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2588-3119 
022 |a 2588-3127 
024 7 |a 10.22059/wsps.2025.401951.1552  |2 doi 
035 |a 3285780397 
045 2 |b d20251001  |b d20251231 
100 1 |a Salehi, Karim  |u Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran 
245 1 |a Artificial Intelligence and the Future of International Law and Power * 
260 |b University of Tehran, Faculty of World Studies  |c Autumn 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a This study investigates the way in which public discourse on social media reflects and shapes global power dynamics surrounding AI. Leveraging a corpus of approximately 21,000 English-language posts from Platform X (2021-2025), this study utilizes a computational linguistics framework-incorporating topic modeling, sentiment analysis, emotion classification, and named entity recognition-to analyze the construction of AI, interrogating its thematic narratives and affective investments across geopolitical contexts. Findings reveal a discourse shaped by U.S.-China technological rivalry, AI militarization, and infrastructural sovereignty, with strong currents of fear, anger, and skepticism. While Western powers and corporate actors dominate the narrative space, alternative discourses from the Global South emphasize digital dependency, exclusion, and justice. The emotional intensity and thematic complexity of the discourse suggest that publics are not simply reacting to geopolitical developments, but actively construct contested imaginaries of AI's role in world order. This research contributes to a growing body of literature that recognizes public discourse as a critical site of informal geopolitics and underscores the need for more inclusive, responsive, and ethically grounded AI governance frameworks. 
610 4 |a European Union 
651 4 |a United States--US 
651 4 |a China 
653 |a Narratives 
653 |a Ethics 
653 |a Geopolitics 
653 |a Classification 
653 |a Communication 
653 |a Data mining 
653 |a Discourses 
653 |a Social dynamics 
653 |a Diplomacy 
653 |a International law 
653 |a Politics 
653 |a Multinational corporations 
653 |a International organizations 
653 |a Traditions 
653 |a Emotions 
653 |a Sentiment analysis 
653 |a Trade restrictions 
653 |a Artificial intelligence 
653 |a Discourse 
653 |a Sovereignty 
653 |a Militarization 
653 |a Social media 
653 |a Anger 
653 |a Algorithms 
653 |a Surveillance 
653 |a Governance 
653 |a Monopolies 
653 |a World order 
653 |a Emotion recognition 
653 |a Social networks 
653 |a Cybersecurity 
653 |a Infrastructure 
653 |a Power structure 
653 |a International relations 
653 |a Natural language processing 
653 |a Power 
653 |a Emotional regulation 
653 |a Computational linguistics 
653 |a Dependency 
700 1 |a Khiyaban, Simin Habib Zadeh  |u Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran 
700 1 |a Sabbar, Shoaib  |u Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran 
773 0 |t Journal of World Sociopolitical Studies  |g vol. 9, no. 4 (Autumn 2025), p. 923-959 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Political Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3285780397/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3285780397/fulltext/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3285780397/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch