Multimodal predictors of cross‐sectional and longitudinal memory in a cognitively unimpaired aging cohort

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Alzheimer's & Dementia vol. 21 (Dec 1, 2025)
Autor principal: Trelle, Alexandra N.
Otros Autores: Sheng, Jintao, Tran, Tammy T., Wilson, Ted N., Sai, Isha, Romero, America, Park, Jennifer, Guerra, Lucah Medina, Deutsch, Gayle K., Wagner, Anthony D., Mormino, Elizabeth C.
Publicado:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3286018762
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1552-5260 
022 |a 1552-5279 
024 7 |a 10.1002/alz70862_110143  |2 doi 
035 |a 3286018762 
045 0 |b d20251201 
100 1 |a Trelle, Alexandra N.  |u Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA 
245 1 |a Multimodal predictors of cross‐sectional and longitudinal memory in a cognitively unimpaired aging cohort 
260 |b John Wiley & Sons, Inc.  |c Dec 1, 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Background Episodic memory function in aging varies considerably both across individuals and within individuals over time. Identifying factors that explain variance in memory is important for improving prediction of risk for cognitive decline in older adults. Here we examine associations of structural, functional, and molecular factors with cross‐sectional and longitudinal memory function in a normal aging cohort. Method Participants were enrolled in the Stanford Aging and Memory Study (SAMS; N&#xa0;=&#xa0;212; mean age: 69.5 ± 5.8 years, 57% female) and cognitively unimpaired at baseline. As part of an ongoing longitudinal extension of SAMS, a subset of participants (N&#xa0;=&#xa0;79) have returned for longitudinal cognitive assessment (mean follow‐up: 7.08 ± 1.14 years). Memory was assessed using a composite score comprised of delayed recall subtests from Logical Memory, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test and the Brief Visual Memory Test. Baseline predictors of interest included Lumipulse CSF pTau181, hippocampus volume from manually segmented T2‐structural MRI, and fMRI measures of neural selectivity and cortical reinstatement measured during associative memory encoding and retrieval, respectively. Linear models and linear mixed effects models examined cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations, respectively, between predictors of interest and memory performance. All models included age, sex, and education as covariates. Result All baseline predictors exhibited significant associations with age (p <&#xa0;.005). Among baseline predictors, associations were observed between reinstatement and neural selectivity (β = 0.37, p <&#xa0;.001) and between reinstatement and CSF pTau181 (β = ‐0.20, p <&#xa0;.05). Cross‐sectional effects with the memory composite were observed across both functional measures (neural selectivity: β = 0.20, p <&#xa0;.01; reinstatement: β = 0.20, p <&#xa0;.001). Associations with CSF pTau (p <&#xa0;.001) and hippocampus volume (p <&#xa0;.01) were observed when examining longitudinal change in memory over time. A trend level association between neural selectivity and longitudinal memory performance was also present (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;.07). Conclusion Functional, structural, and molecular markers relevant for aging and Alzheimer's disease independently impact memory performance in human aging. Combining these measures may improve the prediction of clinically meaningful decline and elucidate factors that promote cognitive maintenance in older age. 
653 |a Linear analysis 
653 |a Episodic memory 
653 |a Aging 
653 |a Delayed recall 
653 |a Age 
653 |a Memory 
653 |a Encoding (Cognitive process) 
653 |a Functional magnetic resonance imaging 
653 |a Verbal memory 
653 |a Retrieval 
653 |a Older people 
653 |a Cognition 
653 |a Associative memory 
653 |a Verbal learning 
653 |a Cognitive impairment 
653 |a Encoding 
653 |a Adults 
653 |a Reinstatement 
653 |a Hippocampus 
653 |a Alzheimer's disease 
653 |a Sex education 
653 |a Academic achievement 
653 |a Visual memory 
700 1 |a Sheng, Jintao  |u Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 
700 1 |a Tran, Tammy T.  |u Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 
700 1 |a Wilson, Ted N.  |u Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA 
700 1 |a Sai, Isha  |u Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 
700 1 |a Romero, America  |u University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA 
700 1 |a Park, Jennifer  |u Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA 
700 1 |a Guerra, Lucah Medina  |u Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA 
700 1 |a Deutsch, Gayle K.  |u Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA 
700 1 |a Wagner, Anthony D.  |u Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 
700 1 |a Mormino, Elizabeth C.  |u Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA 
773 0 |t Alzheimer's & Dementia  |g vol. 21 (Dec 1, 2025) 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Consumer Health Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286018762/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286018762/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286018762/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch