Challenges and Strategies for Resident Participation Ordinances to Prevent Construction Defects in Korean Local Governments

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Опубліковано в::Administrative Sciences vol. 15, no. 12 (2025), p. 497-518
Автор: Kim Eu Wang
Інші автори: Kim, Kyong Ju, Shin Yeon Ju, Cho Namho, Shin, Dong Cheol
Опубліковано:
MDPI AG
Предмети:
Онлайн доступ:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3286238250
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2076-3387 
024 7 |a 10.3390/admsci15120497  |2 doi 
035 |a 3286238250 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 231329  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Kim Eu Wang  |u Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea; kew1013@cau.ac.kr (E.W.K.); kjkim@cau.ac.kr (K.J.K.); shinyeanju@cau.ac.kr (Y.J.S.) 
245 1 |a Challenges and Strategies for Resident Participation Ordinances to Prevent Construction Defects in Korean Local Governments 
260 |b MDPI AG  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Many Korean local governments have enacted ordinances that enable resident participation in the supervision of public construction projects, yet an implementation gap persists between the legal framework and actual engagement. This study thus examined causes of and strategies for residents’ participation in defect reporting and the role of resident supervisor using a sequential embedded design. Administrative data from local governments were analyzed, followed by 94 survey data from resident representatives. Awareness about the defect reporting and role of resident supervisor was low, while support and intention for participation were higher. Awareness, perceived ordinance effectiveness, and support for resident participation were associated with intention, whereas financial rewards showed no significant association. These results suggest that insufficient awareness and trust—not lack of motivation—are the primary barriers, indicating the need to shift from offering rewards to targeted communication, procedural transparency, and capacity-building. This study’s contribution is its mixed-methods empirical assessment of this gap, informing the design of resident-participation policies by prioritizing awareness campaigns, procedural transparency, and training for resident supervisors. 
653 |a Participation 
653 |a Transparency 
653 |a Defects 
653 |a Whistleblowing 
653 |a Urban planning 
653 |a Consciousness 
653 |a Rewards 
653 |a Supervisors 
653 |a Urban development 
653 |a Local government 
653 |a Public spaces 
653 |a Infrastructure 
653 |a Motivation 
653 |a Citizen participation 
653 |a Quality management 
653 |a Prevention 
653 |a Decision making 
653 |a Prioritizing 
653 |a Supervision 
653 |a Design 
653 |a Construction industry 
653 |a Literature reviews 
653 |a Capacity building approach 
700 1 |a Kim, Kyong Ju  |u Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea; kew1013@cau.ac.kr (E.W.K.); kjkim@cau.ac.kr (K.J.K.); shinyeanju@cau.ac.kr (Y.J.S.) 
700 1 |a Shin Yeon Ju  |u Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea; kew1013@cau.ac.kr (E.W.K.); kjkim@cau.ac.kr (K.J.K.); shinyeanju@cau.ac.kr (Y.J.S.) 
700 1 |a Cho Namho  |u Design and Construction, Facility Management, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52241, USA; namho-cho@uiowa.edu 
700 1 |a Shin, Dong Cheol  |u Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea; kew1013@cau.ac.kr (E.W.K.); kjkim@cau.ac.kr (K.J.K.); shinyeanju@cau.ac.kr (Y.J.S.) 
773 0 |t Administrative Sciences  |g vol. 15, no. 12 (2025), p. 497-518 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ABI/INFORM Global 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286238250/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286238250/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286238250/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch