Comparison of Transvaginal and Transperineal Ultrasonographic Uterocervical Angle Measurements in Low-Risk Pregnancies at 24–34 Weeks’ Gestation

Guardado en:
Bibliografiske detaljer
Udgivet i:Diagnostics vol. 15, no. 24 (2025), p. 3232-3243
Hovedforfatter: Dagdeviren Emrah
Andre forfattere: Kaya Yucel
Udgivet:
MDPI AG
Fag:
Online adgang:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3286271683
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2075-4418 
024 7 |a 10.3390/diagnostics15243232  |2 doi 
035 |a 3286271683 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 231452  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Dagdeviren Emrah  |u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul 34480, Turkey 
245 1 |a Comparison of Transvaginal and Transperineal Ultrasonographic Uterocervical Angle Measurements in Low-Risk Pregnancies at 24–34 Weeks’ Gestation 
260 |b MDPI AG  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Background: The uterocervical angle (UCA) is a promising ultrasound parameter for predicting preterm birth. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) is the gold standard for cervical assessment; however, some patients may decline the procedure due to discomfort or embarrassment. Although transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) offers an alternative associated with less discomfort, comparative data on UCA measurements between these two methods are limited. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the consistency and agreement between UCA measurements obtained using TVUS and TPUS in pregnant women between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, UCA and CL measurements of 189 pregnant women between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation were performed using TVUS and TPUS by a single specialist. Of these, 25 women (13.2%) were excluded due to inadequate TPUS image quality. A total of 164 women were included in the statistical analysis. Pearson correlation analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and Bland–Altman analysis were performed. Results: UCA measurements showed a high positive correlation between TVUS and TPUS (r = 0.833, p < 0.001). The ICC was 0.827 (95% CI: 0.77–0.87), indicating good consistency, and the CCC was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76–0.86). The Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated a median difference of 3° between UCA measurements obtained via TVUS and TPUS. The non-parametric limits of agreement, represented by the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles, ranged from −20.9° to 34.8°. Conclusions: TPUS shows insufficient agreement to be used interchangeably with TVUS for UCA measurement. Although the level of consistency is high, inadequate image quality in a subset of cases and the uncertainty regarding the clinical utility of TPUS-derived measurements for predicting preterm birth limit its current clinical applicability. 
653 |a Agreements 
653 |a Rectum 
653 |a Software 
653 |a Womens health 
653 |a Bladder 
653 |a Pregnancy complications 
653 |a Acoustics 
653 |a Vagina 
653 |a Premature birth 
653 |a Cervix 
653 |a Ultrasonic imaging 
653 |a Gestational age 
653 |a Uterus 
700 1 |a Kaya Yucel  |u Division of Perinatology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul 34480, Turkey; yucelkaya0007@gmail.com 
773 0 |t Diagnostics  |g vol. 15, no. 24 (2025), p. 3232-3243 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Research Library 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286271683/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286271683/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286271683/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch