MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3286276039
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2227-7102 
022 |a 2076-3344 
024 7 |a 10.3390/educsci15121664  |2 doi 
035 |a 3286276039 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 231457  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Xin Yan Ping 
245 1 |a Conceptual Model-Based Problem Solving: An Evidence-Based Review for Students Who Are Struggling in Mathematics 
260 |b MDPI AG  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Over the past decade, the mathematical performance of at-risk students has not improved and has, in fact, declined since 2020. Conceptual Model-Based Problem-Solving (COMPS) strategies have been studied by researchers in and outside of the U.S. To date, there is no systematic review evaluating this body of research. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review evaluating the quality and evidence base of research studies that utilized COMPS strategies in helping students learn mathematics. A total of 20 studies involving students with disabilities or learning difficulties in mathematics, with grade levels ranging from third to eighth grade, were included in this review. We used Council for Exceptional Children quality indicators and What Works Clearinghouse standards to evaluate the methodology rigor of this body of research and determine the evidence base of the COMPS strategies. The results of this systematic review of the evidence base indicate that COMPS is an evidence-based practice particularly based on the single-case design studies identified in this review. Implications for future research and practices are discussed in the context of paradigm shifts in mathematics teaching and learning. 
610 4 |a Council for Exceptional Children 
651 4 |a United States--US 
653 |a Problem solving 
653 |a Learning disabilities 
653 |a Memory 
653 |a Students with disabilities 
653 |a Mathematics education 
653 |a Evidence-based practice 
653 |a Mathematical problems 
653 |a Disability 
653 |a Exceptional children 
653 |a Mathematics teachers 
653 |a Semantic analysis 
653 |a Autism 
653 |a Special education 
653 |a Literature reviews 
653 |a Systematic review 
653 |a Learning 
653 |a Semantics 
653 |a Elementary School Mathematics 
653 |a Educational Resources 
653 |a Learning Problems 
653 |a Direct Instruction 
653 |a Cognitive Processes 
653 |a Database Design 
653 |a Mathematics Achievement 
653 |a Exceptional Child Research 
653 |a Coding 
653 |a Mathematics Instruction 
653 |a Equations (Mathematics) 
653 |a Data Analysis 
653 |a Evidence Based Practice 
653 |a Mathematical Formulas 
653 |a English Learners 
653 |a Elementary Secondary Education 
653 |a Algebra 
653 |a Autism Spectrum Disorders 
653 |a Mathematical Models 
653 |a Database Management Systems 
653 |a Educational Needs 
653 |a Abstract Reasoning 
700 1 |a Wang, Yichen 
700 1 |a Yilmaz, Yenioglu Busra 
700 1 |a Yu Lejia 
773 0 |t Education Sciences  |g vol. 15, no. 12 (2025), p. 1664-1683 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Education Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286276039/abstract/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286276039/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286276039/fulltextPDF/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch