Same Coin, Different Value: A Multi-Year Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance of Open Access and Legacy Publishers

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Publications vol. 13, no. 4 (2025), p. 46-73
1. Verfasser: Peppas, George
Weitere Verfasser: Papachristopoulos Leonidas, Tsakonas Giannis
Veröffentlicht:
MDPI AG
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie das erste Tag hinzu!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3286345598
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2304-6775 
024 7 |a 10.3390/publications13040046  |2 doi 
035 |a 3286345598 
045 2 |b d20251001  |b d20251231 
084 |a 231647  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Peppas, George  |u School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, 26335 Patras, Greece 
245 1 |a Same Coin, Different Value: A Multi-Year Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance of Open Access and Legacy Publishers 
260 |b MDPI AG  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a We are living in an era where the demand for Open Access to knowledge is growing and the need for transparency in scientific publishing is becoming imperative. The question that arises at this stage is whether openness in knowledge constitutes the Achilles heel of the once profitable legacy publishing industry or whether it is the Trojan horse of the latter for increasing its revenues. At the same time, the question of whether Open Access publishers can ensure their sustainability through this model remains unanswered. This study implements a multi-year analysis (2019–2023) comparing the performance of Open Access and legacy publishers. Using a set of financial ratios—grouped by profitability, liquidity, efficiency, and solvency, as well as data on firm size (revenues, assets, and employee counts), we assess their financial performance. The results indicate that legacy publishers have enormous scale, stable profitability, and high leverage, but low liquidity and return on equity. On the other hand, OA publishers, although smaller, have higher returns, better liquidity, and almost zero borrowing, but with greater annual volatility. The study discusses that OA publishers, despite their small size, can be as profitable as or even more profitable than traditional publishers, thanks to flexible structures and fast cash flows, but remain vulnerable due to limited resources and the risk of acquisition. Furthermore, legacy publishers maintain their dominance by leveraging their scale, strong brands, and investment capacity while adopting or acquiring OA models, creating a competitive environment where scale and strategic differentiation are decisive. 
610 4 |a MDPI 
653 |a Commodification 
653 |a Ratios 
653 |a Publishing industry 
653 |a Knowledge 
653 |a Profits 
653 |a Business models 
653 |a Financial statement analysis 
653 |a Access to information 
653 |a Financial analysis 
653 |a Literature reviews 
653 |a Libraries 
653 |a Scholarly publishing 
653 |a Scholarly communication 
653 |a Competition 
653 |a Open access 
700 1 |a Papachristopoulos Leonidas  |u Department of Archive, Library and Museum Sciences, Ionian University, 49100 Corfu, Greece; lpapachr@ionio.gr 
700 1 |a Tsakonas Giannis  |u Library & Information Center, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece; gtsak@upatras.gr 
773 0 |t Publications  |g vol. 13, no. 4 (2025), p. 46-73 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Research Library 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286345598/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286345598/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286345598/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch