An Abbreviated Version of the Digital Trail Making Test‐ Part B
Đã lưu trong:
| Xuất bản năm: | Alzheimer's & Dementia vol. 21 (Dec 1, 2025) |
|---|---|
| Tác giả chính: | |
| Tác giả khác: | , , , , , |
| Được phát hành: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | Citation/Abstract Full Text - PDF |
| Các nhãn: |
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3286488884 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1552-5260 | ||
| 022 | |a 1552-5279 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/alz70857_104846 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3286488884 | ||
| 045 | 0 | |b d20251201 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Anda‐Duran, Ileana De |u Celia Scott Weatherhead Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA, | |
| 245 | 1 | |a An Abbreviated Version of the Digital Trail Making Test‐ Part B | |
| 260 | |b John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |c Dec 1, 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Background With the availability of monoclonal anti‐body treatment for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD), there is a need to screen and identify emergent disease as soon as possible. In a companion abstract, a panel of six novel outcome measures from the digital Trail Making Test‐Part B (dTMT‐B) was able to dissociate patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) versus normal cognition (NC). The current research fashioned an abbreviated dTMT‐B test and assessed how well this test can dissociate patients with MCI versus NC; and relationships between paper/pencil neuropsychological tests. Method Using a digital neuropsychological battery of episodic and working memory tests, memory clinic patients (n = 58) were classified into groups presenting with MCI versus NC. An abbreviated dTMT‐B test was created by examining behavior confined to approximately the first half of the test, i.e., target circle ‘1’ through target circle ‘F’. The panel of dTMT‐B process metrics included (1) hit duration or time spent with the pen inside target circles; (2) distance or the length of an imaginary line connecting all targets; and (3) the velocity or the speed pen strokes were drawn. Result MCI patients were slightly older and less educated than NC patients; and scored lower on the MMSE. An ANOVA controlled for age, education, and sex found longer hit duration for MCI compared to NC patients (p < 0.004, η2 =  0.204). No differences were found for total distance or pen stroke velocity. Partial correlations controlled for age, education, and sex found that longer hit duration inside target circles was associated with lower performance on tests measuring attention (WAIS‐IV Digits Forward/ Trails A; r = ‐0.724, p < 0.001); working memory (WMS‐IV Symbol Span/ letter fluency; r = ‐0.520, p < 0.007); and episodic memory (CVLT‐9 Delay Free recall/ Recognition; r = ‐0.411, p < 0.037). Conclusion The engineering of the Trail Making Test‐ Part B onto the digital platform has resulted in a panel of new process‐based metrics and potentially increases the versatility of this test. An abbreviated version of the test could easily be deployed to screen for emergent cognitive impairment. | |
| 653 | |a Practitioner patient relationship | ||
| 653 | |a Episodic memory | ||
| 653 | |a Fluency | ||
| 653 | |a Memory tests | ||
| 653 | |a Memory | ||
| 653 | |a Dementia | ||
| 653 | |a Stroke | ||
| 653 | |a Cognition | ||
| 653 | |a Neuropsychology | ||
| 653 | |a Cognitive ability | ||
| 653 | |a Mini-Mental State Examination | ||
| 653 | |a Education | ||
| 653 | |a Neuropsychological assessment | ||
| 653 | |a Cognitive impairment | ||
| 653 | |a Short term memory | ||
| 653 | |a Variance analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Disease | ||
| 653 | |a Medical treatment | ||
| 653 | |a Patients | ||
| 653 | |a Unaided recall | ||
| 653 | |a Sex education | ||
| 653 | |a Alzheimer's disease | ||
| 653 | |a Free recall | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Hwang, Phillip H |u Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Boston, MA, USA, | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Leverant, Elizabeth |u New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan University, Stratford, NJ, USA, | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Emrani, Sheina |u University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thompson, Louisa I. |u Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Andersen, Stacy L. |u Boston University Chobanian &amp; Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA, | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Libon, David J. |u Department of Psychology, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA, | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Alzheimer's & Dementia |g vol. 21 (Dec 1, 2025) | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Consumer Health Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286488884/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286488884/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |