Evaluation of Self‐Mediated Alternatives for Risk Testing Education and Return of Results ‐ eSMARTER: A randomized trial from the Alzheimer’s Prevention Initiative program

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & Dementia vol. 21 (Dec 1, 2025)
1. Verfasser: Langlois, Carolyn
Weitere Verfasser: Bradbury, Angela R., Wood, Elisabeth, Harkins, Kristin, Erickson, Claire M, Salata, Hayley, Walsh, Trisha L, Largent, Emily A., Egleston, Brian L, Reiman, Eric M., Grill, Joshua D, Roberts, J. Scott, Ashton, Nicholas J., Karlawish, Jason, Langbaum, Jessica B.
Veröffentlicht:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Citation/Abstract
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie das erste Tag hinzu!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3286852259
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1552-5260 
022 |a 1552-5279 
024 7 |a 10.1002/alz70859_099986  |2 doi 
035 |a 3286852259 
045 0 |b d20251201 
100 1 |a Langlois, Carolyn  |u Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA 
245 1 |a Evaluation of Self‐Mediated Alternatives for Risk Testing Education and Return of Results ‐ eSMARTER: A randomized trial from the Alzheimer’s Prevention Initiative program 
260 |b John Wiley & Sons, Inc.  |c Dec 1, 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Background Availability of amyloid modifying therapies dramatically increases the need to disclose Alzheimer’s disease (AD) related genetic and/or biomarker test results to inform clinical decision making. An existing shortage of genetic counselors and dementia specialists, coupled with the 21st Century Cures Act requirement to immediately return most medical test results, makes timely development of scalable methods to responsibly communicate test results essential. Method The Evaluation of Self‐Mediated Alternatives for Risk Testing Education and Return of Results (eSMARTER) is a decentralized, randomized, non‐inferiority trial evaluating if disclosure of APOE genotype by participant‐directed scalable digital platforms is non‐inferior to telehealth disclosure with a healthcare provider. Participants also have the option to learn plasma pTau‐217 test results. eSMARTER is enrolling approximately 600 adults aged 60‐80 who have undergone prior APOE testing but report not knowing their APOE results. Participants are randomized to receive results either with via telehealth with a healthcare provider or independently through a digital intervention. Participants in the digital arm can select a web‐based intervention or a chatbot. Participants complete online assessments evaluating cognitive, affective and behavioral patient reported outcomes prior to and at various timepoints after disclosure. Blood samples for pTau‐217 testing and repository storage are collected using remote mobile phlebotomy services. Strategically timed newsletters support participant retention and engagement. Additionally, eSMARTER participants are invited to the ancillary eDROP‐AD study to assess feasibility and acceptance of self‐sampling at‐home using finger prick blood collection with the Capitainer®SEP10 card. Result Enrollment in eSMARTER began in October 2024 and is expected to close in February 2025. Recruitment, screening, and enrollment data will be presented along with participant demographics and key health‐related characteristics. Unique insights and lessons learned from launching a national, decentralized, randomized trial will also be shared. Conclusion The eSMARTER study addresses the need for practical and scalable methods to responsibly communicate AD genetic and/or biomarker results. The eSMARTER digital platforms will be made available to support healthcare providers in returning AD genetic and/or biomarker results to individuals in clinical and research settings. All data and samples collected will be made available for public sharing. 
653 |a Demography 
653 |a Intervention 
653 |a Alzheimer's disease 
653 |a Telemedicine 
653 |a Disclosure 
653 |a Decentralization 
653 |a Dementia 
653 |a Enrollments 
653 |a Inferiority 
653 |a Blood 
653 |a Health care industry 
653 |a Self evaluation 
653 |a 21st century 
653 |a Feasibility 
653 |a Specialists 
653 |a Recruitment 
653 |a Biological markers 
653 |a Medical technology 
653 |a Alternative approaches 
653 |a Prevention programs 
653 |a Health services 
653 |a Genetic counseling 
653 |a Clinical research 
653 |a Mental health services 
653 |a Telecommunications 
653 |a Genetics 
653 |a Education 
653 |a Newsletters 
653 |a Decision making 
653 |a Storage 
653 |a Health care 
653 |a Medical decision making 
653 |a Sampling 
653 |a Clinical decision making 
653 |a Adults 
653 |a Medical screening 
653 |a Computer platforms 
653 |a Blood tests 
653 |a Cognitive-behavioral factors 
653 |a Biomarkers 
653 |a Communication 
700 1 |a Bradbury, Angela R.  |u University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 
700 1 |a Wood, Elisabeth  |u University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 
700 1 |a Harkins, Kristin  |u University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA 
700 1 |a Erickson, Claire M  |u Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA 
700 1 |a Salata, Hayley  |u Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA 
700 1 |a Walsh, Trisha L  |u Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA 
700 1 |a Largent, Emily A.  |u University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 
700 1 |a Egleston, Brian L  |u Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA 
700 1 |a Reiman, Eric M.  |u Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA 
700 1 |a Grill, Joshua D  |u Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA 
700 1 |a Roberts, J. Scott  |u University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 
700 1 |a Ashton, Nicholas J.  |u Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, AZ, USA 
700 1 |a Karlawish, Jason  |u University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA 
700 1 |a Langbaum, Jessica B.  |u Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA 
773 0 |t Alzheimer's & Dementia  |g vol. 21 (Dec 1, 2025) 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Consumer Health Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286852259/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3286852259/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch