Imagen de Portada

Practice effects persist over two decades of cognitive testing: Implications for longitudinal research

Guardado en:
Publicado en:Alzheimer's & Dementia vol. 21 (Dec 1, 2025)
Autor principal: Elman, Jeremy A.
Otros Autores: Buchholz, Erik, Chen, Rouhui, Sanderson‐Cimino, Mark E., Bell, Tyler R., Whitsel, Nathan, Fennema‐Notestine, Christine, Reynolds, Chandra A., Toomey, Rosemary, McKenzie, Ruth E, Lyons, Michael J., Tu, Xin M, Franz, Carol E., Kremen, William S., Panizzon, Matthew S.
Publicado:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Materias:
Episodic memory
Attrition
Age
Fluency
Memory tests
Memory
Medical diagnosis
Clinical trials
Clinical research
Age differences
Cognition
Neuropsychology
Longitudinal studies
Midlife
Aging
Age effects
Executive function
Biological markers
Biomarkers
Twin studies
Alzheimer's disease
Visual memory
Spatial memory
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Resumen:Background Repeated cognitive testing can boost performance due to practice effects (PEs). Follow‐up scores are rarely adjusted for PEs, but such correction can be highly important as it has been shown to result in earlier detection of MCI and increased validity based on concordance with Alzheimer's biomarkers. However, it remains unclear to what extent PEs persist across multiple follow‐ups and long durations, which are further complicated by normative age‐related decline. We examined PEs across 17 years from midlife to old age in a nonclinical sample. Method Men (N = 1,608) in the longitudinal Vietnam Era Twin Study of Aging (VETSA) completed neuropsychological batteries over 4 waves: wave 1(N = 1,290, mean age=56); wave 2, mean ages=62); wave 3 (mean age=68); wave 4 (mean age=73). Waves 2 and 3 also included age‐matched attrition replacements. By comparing returnees’ performance to replacements being assessed for the first time, we estimated PEs for 30 tests at each wave using generalized estimating equations, accounting for normative age effects and differential patterns of missingness. We calculated unadjusted and PE‐adjusted cognitive scores (episodic memory, executive function, fluency, processing speed, visual memory, and visuospatial). At each wave we compared MCI prevalence based on unadjusted versus PE‐adjusted scores. Result Among returnees completing all 4 assessments, we found significant PEs for 11 tests at wave 2, 8 tests at wave 3, and 5 tests at wave 4. PEs were most apparent among episodic and visual memory tests. PE‐adjusted cognitive factor scores were significantly lower than unadjusted factor scores at all follow‐ups for all domains except fluency. MCI prevalence increased up to 20% after PE adjustment (from 14% to 18% at wave 4), indicating earlier detection. Conclusion PEs persist across multiple assessments and decades, even with long testing intervals. Importantly, even very small PEs can shift scores below the impairment threshold, resulting in earlier detection and diagnosis of MCI. Additionally, we previously showed that PE‐adjusted MCI diagnosis increases accuracy based on biomarker concordance and would dramatically reduce costs and length of clinical trials by reducing necessary sample size and increasing power. These results underscore the importance of accounting for PEs in longitudinal studies.
ISSN:1552-5260
1552-5279
DOI:10.1002/alz70857_106014
Fuente:Consumer Health Database