Psychometric Evaluation of the Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation Inventory in Ecuadorian Population

שמור ב:
מידע ביבליוגרפי
הוצא לאור ב:Inquiry vol. 62 (Jan 2025)
מחבר ראשי: Oleas, Daniel
מחברים אחרים: José Alejandro Valdevila Figueira, Santiestevan, Rocio Valdevila, Moreta-Herrera, Rodrigo, Mascialino, Guido, Rodas, Jose A
יצא לאור:
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC.
נושאים:
גישה מקוונת:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
תגים: הוספת תג
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3287008298
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0046-9580 
022 |a 1945-7243 
024 7 |a 10.1177/00469580251337665  |2 doi 
035 |a 3287008298 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20250131 
084 |a 23871  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Oleas, Daniel  |u Universidad Ecotec, Samborondón, Ecuador 
245 1 |a Psychometric Evaluation of the Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation Inventory in Ecuadorian Population 
260 |b SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC.  |c Jan 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a The Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation (PANSI) inventory is a widely used measure to assess risk and protective factors associated with suicidal ideation. Despite its use in various populations, its psychometric properties have not been evaluated in Ecuador. This study examines the reliability, factorial structure, and convergent validity of the PANSI in a sample of Ecuadorian university students. A total of 702 university students completed the PANSI, the Beck Hopelessness Scale, and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to evaluate the factorial structure of the PANSI. Convergent validity was examined through Pearson correlations between PANSI subscales and external measures. Both subscales of the PANSI demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Negative Suicide Ideation: ω = 0.95; Positive Suicide Ideation: ω = 0.82). CFA supported the original 2-factor model, with adequate fit indices (RMSEA = 0.092, SRMR = 0.08, CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99). The Negative Suicide Ideation subscale correlated positively with hopelessness (r = .518, P < .001) and negatively with self-esteem (r = −.529, P < .001), while the Positive Suicide Ideation subscale correlated negatively with hopelessness (r = −.557, P < .001) and positively with self-esteem (r = .530, P < .001), supporting convergent validity. The findings indicate that the PANSI is a reliable and valid measure for assessing suicidal ideation in Ecuadorian university students, and arguably, Ecuadorian population. Its ability to capture both risk and protective factors highlights its utility in clinical and educational settings for suicide prevention efforts. 
651 4 |a Ecuador 
653 |a Measures 
653 |a Reliability 
653 |a Confirmatory factor analysis 
653 |a Protective factors 
653 |a Self esteem 
653 |a Property 
653 |a College students 
653 |a Mental disorders 
653 |a Questionnaires 
653 |a Colleges & universities 
653 |a Suicide 
653 |a Risk assessment 
653 |a University students 
653 |a Validation studies 
653 |a Young adults 
653 |a Validity 
653 |a Quantitative psychology 
653 |a Suicidal ideation 
653 |a Public health 
653 |a Suicidal behavior 
653 |a Teenagers 
653 |a Suicide prevention 
653 |a Prevention programs 
653 |a Discriminant analysis 
653 |a Hopelessness 
653 |a Factor analysis 
653 |a Convergent validity 
653 |a Factor structure 
653 |a Data collection 
653 |a Ability 
653 |a Risk factors 
700 1 |a José Alejandro Valdevila Figueira  |u Universidad Ecotec, Samborondón, Ecuador; Instituto de Neurociencias de Guayaquil, Ecuador; Research Network in Psychology and Psychiatry (GIPSI), Guayaquil, Ecuador 
700 1 |a Santiestevan, Rocio Valdevila  |u Research Network in Psychology and Psychiatry (GIPSI), Guayaquil, Ecuador 
700 1 |a Moreta-Herrera, Rodrigo  |u Pontificia Universidad Católica Del Ecuador, Ambato, Ecuador 
700 1 |a Mascialino, Guido  |u Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador 
700 1 |a Rodas, Jose A  |u Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador; University College Dublin, Ireland 
773 0 |t Inquiry  |g vol. 62 (Jan 2025) 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ABI/INFORM Global 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3287008298/abstract/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3287008298/fulltext/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3287008298/fulltextPDF/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch