Ensamkommande på Undantag Rättslig Normbildning som Textpraktik i Vägledande Barnasylärenden

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:PQDT - Global (2025)
Autor principal: Pfister, Linda
Publicado:
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full text outside of ProQuest
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3289724421
003 UK-CbPIL
035 |a 3289724421 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 189128  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Pfister, Linda 
245 1 |a <strong>Ensamkommande på Undantag</strong> Rättslig Normbildning som Textpraktik i Vägledande Barnasylärenden 
260 |b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses  |c 2025 
513 |a Dissertation/Thesis 
520 3 |a When the Swedish Migration Court of Appeal adjudicates a case, it establishes both a case-specific norm and a general norm for future legal application, transforming individual circumstances into legally valid statements. This dissertation examines how this textual process is realised in guiding child asylum cases, focusing on the establishment of norms for exceptions to expulsion and re-entry bans for unaccompanied minors in the precedents MIG 2009:8, MIG 2009:9, and MIG 2015:23. Adopting a social constructivist perspective, the study conceptualises language as a means of structuring experiences, defining interpretive boundaries, and generating normative significance. The analysis integrates a legal-linguistic framework with intertextual and social semiotic theory to examine how text structure, voice distribution, and grammatical choices interact to recontextualise legal reasoning within the precedents.The study demonstrates how text structure shapes the legal process by integrating actor statements and legislative voices into a sequential structure. The Court transforms a heterogeneous set of materials into a legal decision in which each sequence performs a distinct function: case texts establish the grounds for adjudication, legal texts define the interpretive framework, and the judgment determines the final interpretation. The thematization and distribution of reasons across sequences determine their legal weight, thereby establishing the conditions under which knowledge is transformed into a norm. This process constructs an epistemic hierarchy, assigning greater weight to some voices while restricting others’ capacity to define valid knowledge.The analysis further investigates how polyphony operates both as a structural challenge and as a resource for justice in assessing children’s legal status. Grammatical analysis demonstrates how ideational, interpersonal, and textual resources shape voice distribution and epistemic authority, and how language-ideological principles in asylum adjudication privilege certain expressions and experiences. These principles create interpretive hierarchies that can diminish the impact of children’s narratives; however, the study also shows that such narratives can retain legal weight when corroborated by adult actors, even without being reformulated into adult-normative terminology.The findings demonstrate how text structure, voice distribution, and grammatical choices influence legal norm formation, and underscore the importance of preventing marginalisation by consciously managing these elements. They provide insights for strengthening the legitimacy and fairness of precedents through greater transparency and the inclusion of relevant perspectives, thereby enhancing legal certainty, particularly in cases involving vulnerable groups. 
653 |a Minors 
653 |a Text structure 
653 |a Linguistics 
653 |a Scandinavian studies 
773 0 |t PQDT - Global  |g (2025) 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3289724421/abstract/embedded/160PP4OP4BJVV2EV?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full text outside of ProQuest  |u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-564732