The reliability and internal consistency of an Internet-capable computer program for measuring utilities

Guardado en:
Bibliografiske detaljer
Udgivet i:Quality of Life Research vol. 9, no. 7 (Jul 2000), p. 811
Hovedforfatter: Lenert, Leslie A
Udgivet:
Springer Nature B.V.
Fag:
Online adgang:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 883838824
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0962-9343 
022 |a 1573-2649 
024 7 |a 10.1023/A:1008933720016  |2 doi 
035 |a 883838824 
045 2 |b d20000701  |b d20000731 
084 |a 11297023 
084 |a 138140  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Lenert, Leslie A 
245 1 |a The reliability and internal consistency of an Internet-capable computer program for measuring utilities 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c Jul 2000 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and internal consistency of measurements of utilities performed with a computer program (iMPACT2) designed for Internet surveys and Internet patient decision-support systems. Methods: We implemented the Internet Multimedia Preference Assessor Construction Tool, version 2 (iMPACT2) program using the combination of a web server, HTML files, and a web-accessible database. The program randomized subjects, screened their responses for missing data and failures of internal consistency, assisted patients with resolving certain inconsistencies, and, upon a subject's completion of the protocol, provided a report of results to the research assistant administering the program. To validate the iMPACT2 program, we recruited 60 healthy community volunteers and elicited preferences in a research-lab setting using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the standard gamble (SG) for subject's current health and three hypothetical states. For purposes of comparison, we also administered a Short Form-12 (SF-12) health-assessment questionnaire. Subjects used the computer software on two occasions separated by 2-4 weeks of time. Results: Visual analog scale and standard gamble ratings for subjects' current health were reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.82 and 0.84 (two outliers excluded - 0.60 without exclusions), respectively) were comparable with the reliability of the Physical and Mental Component scales of the SF-12 (ICCs of 0.84 and 0.75, respectively). Subjects could easily discriminate between hypothetical states (D scores 0.74 for SG and 0.90 for VAS), and 94% had a completely internally consistent ordering of preference ratings for states. Conclusions: iMPACT2 produces measurements of standard gamble utilities that are reliable and have a high degree of internal consistency. Procedures for assessment of utilities developed for desktop computer programs can be translated to software designed for the Internet, facilitating the use of utilities and endpoints in clinical trials and development of web-based decision-support applications for patients. However, further testing, including direct comparisons with traditional interviewer administered utility elicitation protocols, is needed.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]   The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and internal consistency of measurements of utilities performed with a computer program (iMPACT2) designed for Internet surveys and Internet patient decision-support systems. We implemented the Internet Multimedia Preference Assessor Construction Tool, version 2 (iMPACT2) program using the combination of a web server, HTML files, and a web-accessible database. The program randomized subjects, screened their responses for missing data and failures of internal consistency, assisted patients with resolving certain inconsistencies, and, upon a subject's completion of the protocol, provided a report of results to the research assistant administering the program. To validate the iMPACT2 program, we recruited 60 healthy community volunteers and elicited preferences in a research-lab setting using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the standard gamble (SG) for subject's current health and three hypothetical states. For purposes of comparison, we also administered a Short Form-12 (SF-12) health-assessment questionnaire. Subjects used the computer software on two occasions separated by 2-4 weeks of time. Visual analog scale and standard gamble ratings for subjects' current health were reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.82 and 0.84 (two outliers excluded -0.60 without exclusions), respectively) were comparable with the reliability of the Physical and Mental Component scales of the SF-12 (ICCs of 0.84 and 0.75, respectively). Subjects could easily discriminate between hypothetical states (D scores 0.74 for SG and 0.90 for VAS), and 94% had a completely internally consistent ordering of preference ratings for states. iMPACT2 produces measurements of standard gamble utilities that are reliable and have a high degree of internal consistency. Procedures for assessment of utilities developed for desktop computer programs can be translated to software designed for the Internet, facilitating the use of utilities and endpoints in clinical trials and development of web-based decision-support applications for patients. However, further testing, including direct comparisons with traditional interviewer administered utility elicitation protocols, is needed. 
650 2 2 |a Analysis of Variance 
650 2 2 |a Decision Making, Computer-Assisted 
650 2 2 |a Female 
650 2 2 |a Humans 
650 1 2 |a Internet 
650 2 2 |a Male 
650 2 2 |a Middle Aged 
650 2 2 |a Multimedia 
650 1 2 |a Quality of Life 
650 2 2 |a Questionnaires 
650 2 2 |a Reproducibility of Results 
650 1 2 |a Software 
653 |a Computers 
653 |a Preferences 
653 |a Studies 
773 0 |t Quality of Life Research  |g vol. 9, no. 7 (Jul 2000), p. 811 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ABI/INFORM Global 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/883838824/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/883838824/fulltext/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/883838824/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch