Madurez esqueletal: el descubrimiento de la edad biológica a través de los métodos de evaluación de vértebras cervicales Baccetti y carpal de Fishman
Objective. Conduct a literature review to answer the question: Is there a difference between the Baccetti and Fishman's carpal cervical vertebrae evaluation method to determine the maximum peak of human growth. Materials and methods. A search was carried out in two databases (PubMed, and SciELO), in...
Tallennettuna:
| Päätekijät: | , |
|---|---|
| Aineistotyyppi: | Online |
| Kieli: | espanja |
| Julkaistu: |
Secretaría de Investigaciones Cien´tíficas de la Universidad de El Salvador
2021
|
| Aiheet: | |
| Linkit: | https://minerva.sic.ues.edu.sv/Minerva/article/view/93 |
| Tagit: |
Ei tageja, Lisää ensimmäinen tagi!
|
| Yhteenveto: | Objective. Conduct a literature review to answer the question: Is there a difference between the Baccetti and Fishman's carpal cervical vertebrae evaluation method to determine the maximum peak of human growth.
Materials and methods. A search was carried out in two databases (PubMed, and SciELO), in which studies (2000-2020) were selected that compared one or both evaluation methods to determine peak growth. In the first selection stage, 248 articles were obtained. Finally, 8 articles were included for review.
Results: Of the total of evaluated studies, 6 presented a high level of correlation between the examined methods and only 2 defined a moderately positive correlation.
Conclusions. There is a correlation between the two evaluation methods for the identification of the maximum growth peak. It was found that the assessment of vertebral age in lateral skull radiographs using the Baccetti method has proven to be statistically reliable, valid and clinically useful, reducing the need for radiographic overexposure for carpal evaluation. |
|---|