Applicability of the CANTAB-PAL Computerized Memory Test in Identifying Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease

Tallennettuna:
Bibliografiset tiedot
Julkaisussa:Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders vol. 34, no. 2 (Sep 2012), p. 83-89
Päätekijä: Junkkila, Jenny
Muut tekijät: Oja, Sakari, Laine, Matti, Karrasch, Mira
Julkaistu:
S. Karger AG
Aiheet:
Linkit:Citation/Abstract
Full Text - PDF
Tagit: Lisää tagi
Ei tageja, Lisää ensimmäinen tagi!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 1267776893
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1420-8008 
022 |a 1421-9824 
022 |a 1013-7424 
024 7 |a 10.1159/000342116  |2 doi 
035 |a 1267776893 
045 2 |b d20120901  |b d20120930 
084 |a 22922741 
084 |a 37871  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Junkkila, Jenny 
245 1 |a Applicability of the CANTAB-PAL Computerized Memory Test in Identifying Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease 
260 |b S. Karger AG  |c Sep 2012 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Aim: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of a computerized test, the CANTAB paired associate learning (PAL) to that of an established and validated noncomputerized test, the CERAD Wordlist Learning task in differentiating between normal aging, aMCI and AD in a cross-sectional design. Methods: 58 participants were assessed (19 with mild probable AD, 17 aMCI, 22 healthy controls). Results: The variables found to best discriminate between the three groups were the CANTAB PAL total errors adjusted (p < 0.0001, 81.0% of the cases correctly classified), and CERAD Wordlist Learning Delayed Recall (p < 0.0001, 77.6% of the cases correctly classified). Using both PAL total errors adjusted and Wordlist Learning Delayed Recall, 84.5% of the cases were correctly classified. Discussion: The results suggest that the CANTAB could be used for screening of AD-typical memory impairment. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]   To compare the diagnostic accuracy of a computerized test, the CANTAB paired associate learning (PAL) to that of an established and validated noncomputerized test, the CERAD Wordlist Learning task in differentiating between normal aging, aMCI and AD in a cross-sectional design. 58 participants were assessed (19 with mild probable AD, 17 aMCI, 22 healthy controls). The variables found to best discriminate between the three groups were the CANTAB PAL total errors adjusted (p < 0.0001, 81.0% of the cases correctly classified), and CERAD Wordlist Learning Delayed Recall (p < 0.0001, 77.6% of the cases correctly classified). Using both PAL total errors adjusted and Wordlist Learning Delayed Recall, 84.5% of the cases were correctly classified. The results suggest that the CANTAB could be used for screening of AD-typical memory impairment. 
650 2 2 |a Aged 
650 2 2 |a Aged, 80 & over 
650 1 2 |a Alzheimer Disease  |x diagnosis 
650 2 2 |a Case-Control Studies 
650 2 2 |a Discriminant Analysis 
650 2 2 |a Female 
650 2 2 |a Humans 
650 2 2 |a Male 
650 2 2 |a Middle Aged 
650 1 2 |a Mild Cognitive Impairment  |x diagnosis 
650 2 2 |a Neuropsychological Tests 
650 2 2 |a Paired-Associate Learning 
653 |a Aging 
653 |a Recall 
653 |a Delayed 
653 |a Cognitive impairment 
653 |a Learning 
653 |a Delayed recall 
653 |a Errors 
653 |a Word lists 
653 |a Memory 
653 |a Educational activities 
653 |a Medical screening 
653 |a Computerization 
653 |a Tests 
653 |a Alzheimer's disease 
653 |a Paired associate learning 
700 1 |a Oja, Sakari 
700 1 |a Laine, Matti 
700 1 |a Karrasch, Mira 
773 0 |t Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders  |g vol. 34, no. 2 (Sep 2012), p. 83-89 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1267776893/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1267776893/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch