An Empirical Comparison of Computer-Assisted Instruction and Field Trip Instructional Methods on Teaching of Basic Science and Technology Curriculum in Nigeria

Kaydedildi:
Detaylı Bibliyografya
Yayımlandı:International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies vol. 7, no. 4 (Dec 2020), p. 22
Yazar: Adams, Samuel Olorunfemi
Diğer Yazarlar: Onwadi, Rachel Uchenna
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi:
Ishik University
Konular:
Online Erişim:Citation/Abstract
Full Text - PDF
Etiketler: Etiketle
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 2753661751
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2409-1294 
022 |a 2520-0968 
024 7 |a 10.23918/ijsses.v7i4p22  |2 doi 
035 |a 2753661751 
045 2 |b d20201201  |b d20201231 
100 1 |a Adams, Samuel Olorunfemi 
245 1 |a An Empirical Comparison of Computer-Assisted Instruction and Field Trip Instructional Methods on Teaching of Basic Science and Technology Curriculum in Nigeria 
260 |b Ishik University  |c Dec 2020 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a This paper examined the impact of Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) and Field Trip Instruction (FTI) on the educating and learning of fundamental science and innovation in upper basic education (Junior Secondary School 1-3). The study employed quasi-experimental design, which is the pre and post-test for control and experimental group design performed at three selected public schools in Gwagwalada Area Council, Abuja. Three research questions and hypotheses guided the study. Two hundred ten (210) junior secondary students (JSS) were randomly selected by a simple ballot method from three secondary schools in Gwagwalada area council of Abuja. A 50 – item questions test called Basic Technology Performance Test (BTPT) developed by the researcher was employed to gather information for the investigation. Scores generated from pre-test and post-test were analyzed using Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient (PPMCC), and the test had a reliability of 0.92. The paired sample and independent-sample t-test were used to analyze the data through the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 25. The result showed that the use of Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) has a better effect on students’ achievement in basic science and technology. It was additionally uncovered from the outcome that there was a significant difference between pre- and post-lesson assessments. Recommendations were made to the teachers that they should always apply Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) materials for effective lesson delivery. 
653 |a Field trips 
653 |a Computer assisted instruction--CAI 
653 |a Quasi-experimental methods 
653 |a Reliability 
653 |a Teachers 
653 |a Teaching 
653 |a Science and technology 
653 |a Secondary schools 
653 |a Research design 
653 |a Test validity and reliability 
653 |a Public schools 
653 |a Teaching methods 
653 |a Secondary school students 
653 |a Social sciences 
653 |a Academic achievement 
653 |a Secondary education 
653 |a Computers 
653 |a Innovations 
653 |a Scores 
653 |a Tests 
653 |a Students 
653 |a Curricula 
653 |a Learning 
700 1 |a Onwadi, Rachel Uchenna 
773 0 |t International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies  |g vol. 7, no. 4 (Dec 2020), p. 22 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Social Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/2753661751/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/2753661751/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch