The State of Julia for Scientific Machine Learning
Salvato in:
| Pubblicato in: | arXiv.org (Dec 20, 2024), p. n/a |
|---|---|
| Autore principale: | |
| Altri autori: | |
| Pubblicazione: |
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | Citation/Abstract Full text outside of ProQuest |
| Tags: |
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3117168867 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2331-8422 | ||
| 035 | |a 3117168867 | ||
| 045 | 0 | |b d20241220 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Berman, Edward | |
| 245 | 1 | |a The State of Julia for Scientific Machine Learning | |
| 260 | |b Cornell University Library, arXiv.org |c Dec 20, 2024 | ||
| 513 | |a Working Paper | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Julia has been heralded as a potential successor to Python for scientific machine learning and numerical computing, boasting ergonomic and performance improvements. Since Julia's inception in 2012 and declaration of language goals in 2017, its ecosystem and language-level features have grown tremendously. In this paper, we take a modern look at Julia's features and ecosystem, assess the current state of the language, and discuss its viability and pitfalls as a replacement for Python as the de-facto scientific machine learning language. We call for the community to address Julia's language-level issues that are preventing further adoption. | |
| 653 | |a Python | ||
| 653 | |a Machine learning | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Ginesin, Jacob | |
| 773 | 0 | |t arXiv.org |g (Dec 20, 2024), p. n/a | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Engineering Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3117168867/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full text outside of ProQuest |u http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10908 |