The State of Julia for Scientific Machine Learning
I tiakina i:
| I whakaputaina i: | arXiv.org (Dec 20, 2024), p. n/a |
|---|---|
| Kaituhi matua: | |
| Ētahi atu kaituhi: | |
| I whakaputaina: |
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
|
| Ngā marau: | |
| Urunga tuihono: | Citation/Abstract Full text outside of ProQuest |
| Ngā Tūtohu: |
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!
|
| Whakarāpopotonga: | Julia has been heralded as a potential successor to Python for scientific machine learning and numerical computing, boasting ergonomic and performance improvements. Since Julia's inception in 2012 and declaration of language goals in 2017, its ecosystem and language-level features have grown tremendously. In this paper, we take a modern look at Julia's features and ecosystem, assess the current state of the language, and discuss its viability and pitfalls as a replacement for Python as the de-facto scientific machine learning language. We call for the community to address Julia's language-level issues that are preventing further adoption. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2331-8422 |
| Puna: | Engineering Database |