Generations X, Y, Z: the effects of personal and positional inequalities on critical thinking digital skills
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Online Information Review vol. 49, no. 1 (2025), p. 35-54 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Publicado: |
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3150292204 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1468-4527 | ||
| 022 | |a 1468-4535 | ||
| 022 | |a 0309-314X | ||
| 022 | |a 1353-2642 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1108/OIR-09-2023-0453 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3150292204 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20250214 | |
| 084 | |a 36206 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lissitsa, Sabina |u School of Communication, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Generations X, Y, Z: the effects of personal and positional inequalities on critical thinking digital skills | |
| 260 | |b Emerald Group Publishing Limited |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a PurposeIn a time of fake news, misinformation, and disinformation, critical thinking has become the most important skill for discerning false, incomplete, and outdated information and communication online. The study examines the effects of personal (gender, age, ethnicity, religiosity, and Big Five personality traits) and positional inequalities (education, occupational status, language proficiency) on critical thinking digital skills (CTDS) among generations X, Y, and Z.Design/methodology/approachAn online survey was conducted among 1,495 Israeli Jews between the ages of 18 and 57, belonging to the X, Y, and Z generations.FindingsThe findings show that CTDS among Gen X were significantly lower, by a large margin, than those of the younger generations, while Gen Z reported the highest level of these skills. Multivariate analysis indicated different effect patterns of personal and positional categorical variables on CTDS. We found that the contribution of personal demographic inequalities (gender, age, ethnicity and religiosity) to the explained variance in CTDS was most pronounced in Gen Y, compared to Gen X and Gen Z. The contribution of Big Five personality traits and positional social inequalities (education, occupational status and language proficiency) to explaining CTDS was similar between Gen X and Gen Y, but much less pronounced among Gen Z.Practical implicationsUnderstanding the intergenerational differences in CTDS is crucial for tailoring educational approaches, promoting inclusivity, and harnessing the diverse strengths of each generation to navigate an ever-evolving digital landscape successfully.Originality/valueFirst of its kind, this study combines Generational Cohort Theory with Resources and Appropriation Theory to identify which inequalities may hinder the acquisition of one of today’s most vital skills among three generations. | |
| 653 | |a Generational differences | ||
| 653 | |a Demographic variables | ||
| 653 | |a Generation Z | ||
| 653 | |a Age differences | ||
| 653 | |a Skills | ||
| 653 | |a Generations | ||
| 653 | |a Task analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Labor market | ||
| 653 | |a COVID-19 | ||
| 653 | |a Internet access | ||
| 653 | |a Education | ||
| 653 | |a Multivariate analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Personality | ||
| 653 | |a False information | ||
| 653 | |a Critical thinking | ||
| 653 | |a Inequality | ||
| 653 | |a Digital literacy | ||
| 653 | |a Religiosity | ||
| 653 | |a Occupational status | ||
| 653 | |a Language proficiency | ||
| 653 | |a Appropriation | ||
| 653 | |a Jewish people | ||
| 653 | |a Social inequality | ||
| 653 | |a Ethnicity | ||
| 653 | |a Five factor model | ||
| 653 | |a Resources | ||
| 653 | |a Generation X | ||
| 653 | |a Gender | ||
| 653 | |a Personality traits | ||
| 653 | |a Competence | ||
| 653 | |a Educational inequality | ||
| 653 | |a Millennials | ||
| 653 | |a Misinformation | ||
| 653 | |a Visual Learning | ||
| 653 | |a World Problems | ||
| 653 | |a Cultural Capital | ||
| 653 | |a Predominantly White Institutions | ||
| 653 | |a Influence of Technology | ||
| 653 | |a Cognitive Processes | ||
| 653 | |a Individualized Instruction | ||
| 653 | |a 21st Century Skills | ||
| 653 | |a Interpersonal Competence | ||
| 653 | |a Skill Development | ||
| 653 | |a Work Environment | ||
| 653 | |a Thinking Skills | ||
| 653 | |a Social Environment | ||
| 653 | |a Cognitive Ability | ||
| 653 | |a Resource Allocation | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t Online Information Review |g vol. 49, no. 1 (2025), p. 35-54 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t ABI/INFORM Global | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3150292204/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3150292204/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3150292204/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |