MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3168656923
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1471-5953 
022 |a 1873-5223 
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104266  |2 doi 
035 |a 3168656923 
045 2 |b d20250201  |b d20250228 
084 |a 170342  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Hwang, Gwo-Jen  |u Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Educational Information and Measurement, National Taichung University of Education, Taichung, Taiwan; Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan 
245 1 |a Facilitating students’ critical thinking, metacognition and problem-solving tendencies in geriatric nursing class: A mixed-method study 
260 |b Elsevier Limited  |c Feb 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Aim The aim of this study was to explore the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in geriatric nursing classes for the design of older adult activities to educate students on how to pose clear questions, provide and identify potentially suitable daily activities for older adults. Background Researchers in various educational fields are increasingly employing GenAI tools such as ChatGPT for curriculum development and research. Question generation is an essential skill for all students to learn to acquire knowledge. However, there is limited experimental evidence on teaching students to correctly use GenAI for assisting with question generation ability and empirical data related to improving students' capacity for solving complex problems remains scarce. Design A mixed-method study design with both quantitative and qualitative analysis. Methods This study investigated the effectiveness of a GenAI-guided prompt-based learning approach implemented in a geriatric nursing class for first-year undergraduate students, involving a cohort of 56 participants. Results Experimental results indicated that the GenAI-guided prompt-based learning approach significantly enhanced students' critical thinking, metacognition and problem-solving tendencies and their question generation via prompts performance. Moreover, participants who engaged in the GenAI-guided prompt-based learning approach found the tasks easier to complete and required less cognitive effort. Conclusions Nursing students using the GenAI-guided prompt-based learning approach outperformed the control group in cognitive network analysis dimensions of clarity, relevance, complexity, precision and engagement. Thus, integrating GenAI prompts into course activities can effectively improve student learning outcomes, reduce metacognitive load and assist in solving learning problems. 
653 |a Problem solving 
653 |a Curriculum development 
653 |a Geriatrics 
653 |a Undergraduate students 
653 |a Nursing 
653 |a Older people 
653 |a Mixed methods research 
653 |a Artificial intelligence 
653 |a Qualitative research 
653 |a Learning 
653 |a Teaching 
653 |a Activities of daily living 
653 |a Metacognition 
653 |a Curricula 
653 |a Network analysis 
653 |a Critical thinking 
653 |a Nursing education 
653 |a Chatbots 
653 |a College students 
653 |a Cognition 
653 |a Questions 
653 |a Nurses 
653 |a Adults 
653 |a Learning outcomes 
653 |a Ability 
653 |a Learning Activities 
653 |a Literature Reviews 
653 |a Instructional Innovation 
653 |a Control Groups 
653 |a Influence of Technology 
653 |a Creative Thinking 
653 |a Adult Learning 
653 |a Active Learning 
653 |a Learning Strategies 
653 |a Learning Processes 
653 |a Cognitive Processes 
653 |a Educational Innovation 
653 |a Learning Theories 
653 |a Instructional Materials 
653 |a Health Promotion 
653 |a Interpersonal Relationship 
653 |a Creativity 
653 |a Aging (Individuals) 
653 |a Educational Environment 
653 |a Learner Engagement 
653 |a Educational Facilities Improvement 
653 |a Educational Researchers 
700 1 |a Pei-Yu, Cheng  |u Department of Information Management, Tamkang University, New Taipei City, Taiwan 
700 1 |a Ching-Yi, Chang  |u School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, 250 Wuxing Street, Taipei 11031, Taiwan 
773 0 |t Nurse Education in Practice  |g vol. 83 (Feb 2025), p. 104266 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Sociology Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3168656923/abstract/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3168656923/fulltext/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3168656923/fulltextPDF/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch