Master students’ perception and attitude on methods of anatomy teaching and assessment, Khartoum, Sudan 2014–2020
Zapisane w:
| Wydane w: | BMC Medical Education vol. 25 (2025), p. 1 |
|---|---|
| 1. autor: | |
| Kolejni autorzy: | , |
| Wydane: |
Springer Nature B.V.
|
| Hasła przedmiotowe: | |
| Dostęp online: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Etykiety: |
Nie ma etykietki, Dołącz pierwszą etykiete!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3175400465 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1472-6920 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12909-025-06857-w |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3175400465 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 58506 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rawan Sharaf Eldein Elamein Hassan | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Master students’ perception and attitude on methods of anatomy teaching and assessment, Khartoum, Sudan 2014–2020 | |
| 260 | |b Springer Nature B.V. |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a BackgroundMedical education relies heavily on anatomy as a fundamental component. Irrespective of their specific field of expertise, it is undeniably essential for doctors to possess a comprehensive grasp of anatomical principles. Teaching and obtaining knowledge of anatomy are highly important and challenging disciplines for both educators and learners. The aim of this study was to assess the perception and attitude towards the methods used for teaching and assessing anatomy among postgraduate students.MethodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on three consecutive cohorts of anatomy master students. The data collection process employed a semi-structured questionnaire, and the data analysis was carried out using the IBM Statistical Programme for Social Sciences version 24 (SPSS 24).ResultsThere was a total of 44 participants who filled out the questionnaire. Among them, 90.9% chose dissection room sessions as the most effective approach for attaining the necessary learning outcomes. Practical dissection was found to be the most successful educational method in terms of stimulating attention (81.1%), offering enjoyment (70.5%), boosting information retention (65.9%), and ensuring satisfaction (59.1%). Of the study participants, 72.7% of the participants hold the belief that the practical dissection test is the most efficient method for evaluating the designated learning goals. The utilisation of multiple-choice questions proved to be highly beneficial in facilitating good comprehension of anatomy and served as the optimal means for evaluating one’s knowledge among 63.6% of the students.ConclusionsOverall, the majority of students held positive views regarding the efficacy of cadaveric dissections in all their forms for transferring knowledge about anatomy. The most effective evaluation procedures were the utilisation of multiple-choice questions and the implementation of the spotter test. | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Sudan | |
| 653 | |a Medical education | ||
| 653 | |a Histology | ||
| 653 | |a Teaching methods | ||
| 653 | |a Public speaking | ||
| 653 | |a Cadavers | ||
| 653 | |a Curricula | ||
| 653 | |a Questionnaires | ||
| 653 | |a Embryology | ||
| 653 | |a Dissection | ||
| 653 | |a Seminars | ||
| 653 | |a Medical errors | ||
| 653 | |a Research methodology | ||
| 653 | |a Medicine | ||
| 653 | |a Knowledge | ||
| 653 | |a Multiple choice | ||
| 653 | |a College students | ||
| 653 | |a Learning | ||
| 653 | |a Teacher Effectiveness | ||
| 653 | |a Supervision | ||
| 653 | |a Group Discussion | ||
| 653 | |a Undergraduate Students | ||
| 653 | |a Graduates | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Resources | ||
| 653 | |a Lecture Method | ||
| 653 | |a College Faculty | ||
| 653 | |a Researchers | ||
| 653 | |a Anatomy | ||
| 653 | |a Theses | ||
| 653 | |a Instructional Effectiveness | ||
| 653 | |a Data Analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Assessment | ||
| 653 | |a Masters Programs | ||
| 653 | |a Place of Residence | ||
| 653 | |a Medical Care Evaluation | ||
| 653 | |a Individual Characteristics | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Razan Sharaf Eldein Elamein Hassan | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khalid Alamin Awad | |
| 773 | 0 | |t BMC Medical Education |g vol. 25 (2025), p. 1 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Healthcare Administration Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3175400465/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3175400465/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3175400465/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |