Effects of self-controlled feedback on learning range of motion measurement techniques and self-efficacy among physical therapy students: a preliminary study

Sábháilte in:
Sonraí bibleagrafaíochta
Foilsithe in:BMC Medical Education vol. 25 (2025), p. 1
Príomhchruthaitheoir: Yamamoto, Ryohei
Rannpháirtithe: Imai, Takaki, Yoshizato, Yushin, Akizuki, Kazunori
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe:
Springer Nature B.V.
Ábhair:
Rochtain ar líne:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Clibeanna: Cuir clib leis
Níl clibeanna ann, Bí ar an gcéad duine le clib a chur leis an taifead seo!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3175400487
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1472-6920 
024 7 |a 10.1186/s12909-025-06908-2  |2 doi 
035 |a 3175400487 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 58506  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Yamamoto, Ryohei 
245 1 |a Effects of self-controlled feedback on learning range of motion measurement techniques and self-efficacy among physical therapy students: a preliminary study 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a BackgroundMeasuring range of motion (ROM) accurately using a universal goniometer or visual estimation is challenging for physical therapy students. Self-controlled (SC) feedback, where learners decide whether to receive feedback, can enhance learning and foster self-efficacy (SE) by promoting self-regulation. However, the impact of SC feedback on skill acquisition in ROM measurement technique and SE in physical therapy students remains unclear. This study investigates the effects of SC feedback on skill acquisition in ROM measurement techniques and students’ SE.MethodsThirty physical therapy students were quasi-randomly assigned to an SC group, which chose feedback during practice, or a Yoked (Yk) group, which received feedback based on the SC group’s schedule. A goniometric measurement task, in which participants measure the ROM of left knee flexion using a universal goniometer, and a visual estimation task, in which they estimate it visually, were set as the learning tasks. After a pretest, they completed the practice (3 trials × 4 blocks) followed by short-term retention test (STRT) and LTRT (LTRT). All tests consisted of 3 trials. Measurement accuracy and time were used as test performance for both tasks. SE of ROM measurements was measured before the start of each test using a 10-point Likert scale. Feedback related to measurement errors were provided during practice in line with each group’s conditions.ResultsThe SC group maintained high feedback frequency (80.0 ± 30.3%) during the practice. Both groups improved measurement accuracy and reduced time for goniometric measurement and visual estimation tasks, but no significant group differences were found. Goniometric accuracy exceeded visual estimation in both groups. SE before the pretest did not correlate with pretest accuracy. However, SE before the STRT correlated with accuracy at that time in both groups. In the SC group, SE before the LTRT test was related to the accuracy at the STRT.ConclusionSC feedback did not demonstrate superior effectiveness, but external feedback improved ROM measurement accuracy and reduced measurement time. Moreover, SE after the practice was temporarily associated with accuracy, suggesting a potential link between SE and performance in skill acquisition. 
653 |a Accuracy 
653 |a Students 
653 |a Regulation 
653 |a Range of motion 
653 |a Motor ability 
653 |a Measurement techniques 
653 |a Physical therapy 
653 |a Self-efficacy 
653 |a Feedback 
653 |a Variance analysis 
653 |a Skills 
653 |a Self Control 
653 |a Skill Development 
653 |a Feedback (Response) 
653 |a Multiple Regression Analysis 
653 |a Patients 
653 |a Medical Services 
653 |a Control Groups 
653 |a Self Efficacy 
653 |a Sample Size 
653 |a Measurement Equipment 
653 |a Medical Education 
700 1 |a Imai, Takaki 
700 1 |a Yoshizato, Yushin 
700 1 |a Akizuki, Kazunori 
773 0 |t BMC Medical Education  |g vol. 25 (2025), p. 1 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Healthcare Administration Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3175400487/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3175400487/fulltext/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3175400487/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch