Comparing the impact of online and in-person active learning in preclinical medical education

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:BMC Medical Education vol. 25 (2025), p. 1
Autor principal: Malta, Kiana
Otros Autores: Glickman, Cynthia, Hunter, Krystal, McBride, Amanda
Publicado:
Springer Nature B.V.
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3175400633
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1472-6920 
024 7 |a 10.1186/s12909-025-06846-z  |2 doi 
035 |a 3175400633 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 58506  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Malta, Kiana 
245 1 |a Comparing the impact of online and in-person active learning in preclinical medical education 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a BackgroundCase-based active learning groups (ALGs) are an approach to learning medicine through the exploration of patient cases in a collaborative small group setting. Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, this institution had to convert the preclinical curriculum to a virtual format. Currently, few studies have explored the effects of this change on relationships and skills in case-based learning, and our study aimed to explore the impact of the virtual curriculum on future physicians’ interpersonal development and learning preferences.MethodsAn anonymous Qualtrics survey consisting of multiple choice questions (MCQs) and an optional open-ended commentary was distributed to medical students in Classes 2023–2025 enrolled at our institution. Only the MCQs were quantitatively analyzed. Comparisons between 2025 and 2023 and 2024 responses, as well as between 2023 and 2024 responses were performed via chi-square analysis, with an alpha level of 0.05 for all the statistical tests.ResultsA total of 158 responses were collected. The class of 2025 students served as a control, as they enrolled after in-person learning was reinstated, whereas Classes 2023 and 2024 students experienced one year of virtual learning. There was no significant difference between virtual or in-person learning in terms of positive impacts on education (p = 0.7), participation (p = 0.2), or teamwork (p = 0.1), but most students rated these skills overall better with in person delivery methods. Additionally, while there was no significant difference across student groups regarding preference for a delivery method, 50.4% of students preferred a hybrid model versus 40.4% who wanted completely in person format, and a 9.2% minority of students were in favor of fully virtual ALG (p = 0.2).ConclusionsOur study revealed that students do not prefer a completely in-person or virtual format. Our data provide a valuable post pandemic evaluation of preclinical students’ engagement and well-being, suggesting that the skills and relationships fostered through virtual case-based learning are preserved. 
610 4 |a Rowan University 
651 4 |a United States--US 
653 |a Medical education 
653 |a Teaching methods 
653 |a Public speaking 
653 |a Blended learning 
653 |a Medical students 
653 |a Core curriculum 
653 |a Distance learning 
653 |a COVID-19 
653 |a Active learning 
653 |a Health education 
653 |a Internet access 
653 |a Educational materials 
653 |a Pandemics 
653 |a Online instruction 
653 |a Coronaviruses 
653 |a Systematic review 
653 |a Multiple choice 
653 |a Educational Quality 
653 |a Peer Relationship 
653 |a Physicians 
653 |a Student Characteristics 
653 |a Curriculum Development 
653 |a Educational Resources 
653 |a Influence of Technology 
653 |a Graduate Students 
653 |a Distance Education 
653 |a Lecture Method 
653 |a Grouping (Instructional Purposes) 
653 |a Educational Methods 
653 |a Instructional Materials 
653 |a Student Surveys 
653 |a Online Courses 
653 |a Electronic Learning 
653 |a In Person Learning 
700 1 |a Glickman, Cynthia 
700 1 |a Hunter, Krystal 
700 1 |a McBride, Amanda 
773 0 |t BMC Medical Education  |g vol. 25 (2025), p. 1 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Healthcare Administration Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3175400633/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3175400633/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3175400633/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch