Kapak Resmi

New adjusted missing value imputation in multiple regression with simple random sampling and rank set sampling methods

Kaydedildi:
Yayımlandı:PLoS One vol. 20, no. 3 (Mar 2025), p. e0316641
Yazar: Sinsomboonthong, Juthaphorn
Diğer Yazarlar: Sinsomboonthong, Saichon
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi:
Public Library of Science
Konular:
Multiple regression analysis
Sample size
Regression analysis
Investigations
Sampling methods
Mean square values
Statistical sampling
Variance
Multivariate analysis
Variables
Missing data
Data analysis
Methods
Estimators
Random sampling
Efficiency
Statistical analysis
Social
Online Erişim:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiketler: Etiketle
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!
Özet:This research compared the efficiency of several adjusted missing value imputation methods in multiple regression analysis. The four imputation methods were the following: regression-ratio quartile1,3 (R-RQ1,3) imputation of Al-Omari, Jemain and Ibrahim; adjusted regression-chain ratio quartile1,3 (AR-CRQ1,3) imputation of Kadilar and Cinji; adjusted regression-multivariate ratio quatile1,3 (AR-MRQ1,3) imputation of Feng, Ni, and Zou; and adjusted regression-multivariate chain ratio quartile1,3 (AR-MCRQ1,3) imputation of Lu for each simple random sampling (SRS) and rank set sampling (RSS). The performance measures mean square error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The study showed that the AR-MRQ1 method with SRS provided the minimum mean square error for small error variance. However, the AR-MCRQ3 provided the minimum mean square error for a large error variance. Considering all error variance in mean absolute percentage error, the AR-MCRQ1 provided the minimum mean absolute percentage error. The AR-MRQ1 method with RSS provided the minimum mean square error for a small error variance. However, the AR-MCRQ3 provided the minimum mean square error for medium and large error variance. Regarding the mean absolute percentage error measure, the AR-MRQ1 provided the minimum mean absolute percentage error for a small error variance. However, the AR-MCRQ1 provided the minimum mean absolute percentage error for medium and large error variance. For both SRS and RSS, AR-MCRQ1 was the best method for missing value imputation in multiple regression analysis, followed by AR-MCRQ3. Moreover, the RSS estimators provided smaller MSE and MAPE than the SRS estimators. Therefore, the RSS estimators were more efficient than the SRS estimators.
ISSN:1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0316641
Kaynak:Health & Medical Collection