Students’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Use in Academic Writing in English as a Foreign Language †

Spremljeno u:
Bibliografski detalji
Izdano u:Education Sciences vol. 15, no. 5 (2025), p. 611
Glavni autor: Nelson, Andrew S
Daljnji autori: Santamaría, Paola V, Javens, Josephine S, Ricaurte, Marvin
Izdano:
MDPI AG
Teme:
Online pristup:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Oznake: Dodaj oznaku
Bez oznaka, Budi prvi tko označuje ovaj zapis!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3211937111
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2227-7102 
022 |a 2076-3344 
024 7 |a 10.3390/educsci15050611  |2 doi 
035 |a 3211937111 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 231457  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Nelson, Andrew S  |u Yachay Tech Language Center, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n y Proyecto Yachay, Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador; anelson@yachaytech.edu.ec (A.S.N.); psantamaria@yachaytech.edu.ec (P.V.S.); jjavens@yachaytech.edu.ec (J.S.J.) 
245 1 |a Students’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Use in Academic Writing in English as a Foreign Language † 
260 |b MDPI AG  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a While research articles on students’ perceptions of large language models such as ChatGPT in language learning have proliferated since ChatGPT’s release, few studies have focused on these perceptions among English as a foreign language (EFL) university students in South America or their application to academic writing in a second language (L2) for STEM classes. ChatGPT can generate human-like text that worries teachers and researchers. Academic cheating, especially in the language classroom, is not new; however, the concept of AI-giarism is novel. This study evaluated how 56 undergraduate university students in Ecuador viewed GenAI use in academic writing in English as a foreign language. The research findings indicate that students worried more about hindering the development of their own writing skills than the risk of being caught and facing academic penalties. Students believed that ChatGPT-written works are easily detectable, and institutions should incorporate plagiarism detectors. Submitting chatbot-generated text in the classroom was perceived as academic dishonesty, and fewer participants believed that submitting an assignment machine-translated from Spanish to English was dishonest. The results of this study will inform academic staff and educational institutions about how Ecuadorian university students perceive the overall influence of GenAI on academic integrity within the scope of academic writing, including reasons why students might rely on AI tools for dishonest purposes and how they view the detection of AI-based works. Ideally, policies, procedures, and instruction should prioritize using AI as an emerging educational tool and not as a shortcut to bypass intellectual effort. Pedagogical practices should minimize factors that have been shown to lead to the unethical use of AI, which, for our survey, was academic pressure and lack of confidence. By and large, these factors can be mitigated with approaches that prioritize the process of learning rather than the production of a product. 
653 |a Undergraduate education 
653 |a Spanish language 
653 |a College students 
653 |a Social networks 
653 |a Student attitudes 
653 |a Higher education 
653 |a Academic writing 
653 |a English as a second language 
653 |a Teachers 
653 |a Second language writing 
653 |a Artificial intelligence 
653 |a Human-computer interaction 
653 |a Plagiarism 
653 |a Computer assisted language learning 
653 |a Language modeling 
653 |a Cheating 
653 |a English as a second language instruction 
653 |a Students 
653 |a Generative artificial intelligence 
653 |a Perceptions 
653 |a Writing 
653 |a Colleges & universities 
653 |a Ethics 
653 |a Penalties 
653 |a Learning 
653 |a Morality 
653 |a Foreign languages 
653 |a Language acquisition 
653 |a Teaching 
653 |a Dishonesty 
653 |a Academic staff 
653 |a English language 
653 |a Classrooms 
653 |a Scholarship 
653 |a Critical Thinking 
653 |a Literature Reviews 
653 |a Independent Study 
653 |a Academic Language 
653 |a Language Skills 
653 |a Influence of Technology 
653 |a Learning Processes 
653 |a Language Teachers 
653 |a Educational Technology 
653 |a Management Systems 
653 |a English (Second Language) 
653 |a Second Languages 
653 |a Integrity 
653 |a Learning Management Systems 
653 |a Social Media 
653 |a Educational Experience 
653 |a English for Academic Purposes 
653 |a English 
653 |a Educational Discrimination 
653 |a Definitions 
653 |a Grammar 
653 |a English Learners 
700 1 |a Santamaría, Paola V  |u Yachay Tech Language Center, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n y Proyecto Yachay, Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador; anelson@yachaytech.edu.ec (A.S.N.); psantamaria@yachaytech.edu.ec (P.V.S.); jjavens@yachaytech.edu.ec (J.S.J.) 
700 1 |a Javens, Josephine S  |u Yachay Tech Language Center, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n y Proyecto Yachay, Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador; anelson@yachaytech.edu.ec (A.S.N.); psantamaria@yachaytech.edu.ec (P.V.S.); jjavens@yachaytech.edu.ec (J.S.J.) 
700 1 |a Ricaurte, Marvin  |u Grupo de Investigación Aplicada en Materiales y Procesos (GIAMP), School of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n y Proyecto Yachay, Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador 
773 0 |t Education Sciences  |g vol. 15, no. 5 (2025), p. 611 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Education Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3211937111/abstract/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3211937111/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3211937111/fulltextPDF/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch