Should BIBFRAME Die?

محفوظ في:

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:	Technicalities vol. 45, no. 3 (May/Jun 2025), p. 18
المؤلف الرئيسي:	Adamich, Tom
منشور في:	Media Periodicals Division, The Kansas City Gardener, Inc.
الموضوعات:	Library of Congress Online Computer Library Center > OCLC Library collections Librarians Library materials Libraries Metadata Linked Data Resource Description & Access-RDA Library catalogs Access to materials Interlibrary loans
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:	Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF
الوسوم:	إضافة وسم لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!

الوصف
مستخلص:	Edmunds states that training, technology, documentation, and staff development costs would be high, citing evidence presented by other notable library scholars, including Marshall Breeding, as well as financial cost information associated with grant-funded BIBFRAME efforts. According to Edmunds, Clarivate and (the much smaller but relevant) EBSCO will dominate the library landscape. While leasing or remote access to library materials is not new, Edmunds is correct that today's landscape of e-books and other digital content (Overdrive, Hoopla, etc.) are the norm. Edmunds highlights the irony of RDA development (in the context of BIBFRAME, the Library Reference Model (LRM), and library linked data) in truly addressing the realities presented by digital content presentation and discovery."
تدمد:	0272-0884
المصدر:	Library Science Database