Should BIBFRAME Die?

Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Pubblicato in:Technicalities vol. 45, no. 3 (May/Jun 2025), p. 18
Autore principale: Adamich, Tom
Pubblicazione:
Media Periodicals Division, The Kansas City Gardener, Inc.
Soggetti:
Accesso online:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
Descrizione
Abstract:Edmunds states that training, technology, documentation, and staff development costs would be high, citing evidence presented by other notable library scholars, including Marshall Breeding, as well as financial cost information associated with grant-funded BIBFRAME efforts. According to Edmunds, Clarivate and (the much smaller but relevant) EBSCO will dominate the library landscape. While leasing or remote access to library materials is not new, Edmunds is correct that today's landscape of e-books and other digital content (Overdrive, Hoopla, etc.) are the norm. Edmunds highlights the irony of RDA development (in the context of BIBFRAME, the Library Reference Model (LRM), and library linked data) in truly addressing the realities presented by digital content presentation and discovery."
ISSN:0272-0884
Fonte:Library Science Database