The effectiveness of blended learning in nursing and medical education: An umbrella review

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Nurse Education in Practice vol. 86 (Jul 2025), p. 104421
Autor principal: Li, Minhui
Otros Autores: Hong, Yanyan, Wu, Aiping, Ou, Wanyi, Yang, Jianmei, Lin, Guiru, Ruan, Yanfei, Chen, Zumin, Lin, Chenli, Liang, Yinji
Publicado:
Elsevier Limited
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3227289909
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1471-5953 
022 |a 1873-5223 
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104421  |2 doi 
035 |a 3227289909 
045 2 |b d20250701  |b d20250731 
084 |a 170342  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Li, Minhui  |u School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China 
245 1 |a The effectiveness of blended learning in nursing and medical education: An umbrella review 
260 |b Elsevier Limited  |c Jul 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Aim To summarize existing research reviews on blended learning's effectiveness in nursing and medical education, offering teaching practitioners valuable references for continuous improvement in blended learning. Design An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses was undertaken using the PRISMA guidelines. Methods This study retrieved all systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to blended learning, which were included in CNKI, VIP database, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library as of December 2024. The methodological quality of the included literature was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 tool, while indications of learning effectiveness at each level were examined through the modified Kirkpatrick Model. Results Seventeen studies were included: four with moderate, four with low and nine with critically low methodological quality. The modified Kirkpatrick Model suggests that blended learning in nursing and medical education may improve student feedback and attitudes and perceptions in the short term. Only nursing education has researched the long-term effects of blended learning, which improves critical thinking, collaborative knowledge and self-directed learning. However, organizational practices, student benefits and patient and community impact research are scarce. Conclusion Blended learning can offer multiple beneficial impacts on students, but majority of the current systematic reviews examining the effectiveness of blended learning exhibit low methodological quality and lack standardized outcome evaluation systems. Future research and practice will also need to improve the standardization of reporting, focus on the long-term effects of blended learning and understand its impact on patients/communities. 
651 4 |a Asia-Pacific region 
653 |a Collaborative learning 
653 |a Databases 
653 |a Medical education 
653 |a Teaching methods 
653 |a Long term 
653 |a Curricula 
653 |a Distance learning 
653 |a Teachers 
653 |a Standardization 
653 |a Systematic review 
653 |a Meta-analysis 
653 |a Teaching 
653 |a Research methodology 
653 |a Online instruction 
653 |a Independent study 
653 |a Noncompliance 
653 |a Nursing education 
653 |a Blended learning 
653 |a Nursing 
653 |a Medical students 
653 |a Skills 
653 |a Selfdirected learning 
653 |a Information technology 
653 |a Critical thinking 
653 |a Literature reviews 
653 |a Education 
653 |a Medical schools 
653 |a Organizational effectiveness 
653 |a Nurses 
653 |a Patients 
653 |a Learning 
653 |a Student attitudes 
653 |a Self instruction 
653 |a Evaluation research 
653 |a Feedback 
653 |a Professional education 
653 |a Cooperative learning 
653 |a Organizational research 
653 |a Community research 
653 |a Students 
653 |a Research 
653 |a Effectiveness 
653 |a Learning Modalities 
653 |a Educational Research 
653 |a Medical Evaluation 
653 |a Online Courses 
653 |a Information Seeking 
653 |a Instructional Effectiveness 
653 |a In Person Learning 
653 |a Database Management Systems 
653 |a Course Content 
653 |a Attitude Change 
653 |a Reprography 
653 |a Control Groups 
653 |a Influence of Technology 
653 |a Conventional Instruction 
653 |a Educational Technology 
653 |a Meta Analysis 
653 |a Electronic Learning 
653 |a Outcomes of Education 
700 1 |a Hong, Yanyan  |u School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China 
700 1 |a Wu, Aiping  |u School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China 
700 1 |a Ou, Wanyi  |u School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China 
700 1 |a Yang, Jianmei  |u School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China 
700 1 |a Lin, Guiru  |u School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China 
700 1 |a Ruan, Yanfei  |u School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China 
700 1 |a Chen, Zumin  |u School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China 
700 1 |a Lin, Chenli  |u School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China; Health Science Center, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China 
700 1 |a Liang, Yinji  |u School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China; Health Science Center, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China 
773 0 |t Nurse Education in Practice  |g vol. 86 (Jul 2025), p. 104421 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Sociology Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227289909/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227289909/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227289909/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch