Lactococcus lactis I7 isolated from traditional Italian cheese making: a biotechnological integrated platform

Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Pubblicato in:BMC Biotechnology vol. 25 (2025), p. 1-15
Autore principale: Alfano, Alberto
Altri autori: Parecha, Darshankumar, Fusco, Alessandra, Savio, Vittoria, Ida De Chiara, Muscariello, Lidia, Donnarumma, Giovanna, Schiraldi, Chiara
Pubblicazione:
Springer Nature B.V.
Soggetti:
Accesso online:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3227639968
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1472-6750 
024 7 |a 10.1186/s12896-025-00997-z  |2 doi 
035 |a 3227639968 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 58461  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Alfano, Alberto 
245 1 |a <i>Lactococcus lactis</i> I7 isolated from traditional Italian cheese making: a biotechnological integrated platform 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a BackgroundThere is growing interest in newly isolated lactic acid bacteria from traditional sources. In this study, a Lactococcus lactis strain identified and isolated from natural whey starter cultures of cow milk for the production of artisanal cheeses was cultivated in optimized vegan grade medium to assess its growing ability and metabolic fingerprint. In fact, traditionally fermented dairy products are considered nutritionally complete and possibly functional to human health with a number of benefits not only to the gastro-intestinal tract but also in a systemic manner.ResultsIn fed batch experiments, we achieved 14 g/L dry cell weight and 1.9∙1010 viable colony forming unit increasing the values of experiment threefold and twofold respect to the batch processes, respectively. Additionally, the lactic acid (LA) production was quantified, and a maximal concentration of 78 g/L was achieved, which is approximately five-fold corresponding to the batch experiment results. This is in agreement with kinetic modeling of LA inhibition studies that highlighted a halved growth rate (µ) at 35 ± 5 g/L of LA whilst the growth blockage occurred at about 80 g/L. The samples obtaining after ultrafiltration processes and tested on three different pathogens, Enterococcus faecalis, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli, gave a reduction on viability by 6–9 log on average.ConclusionThis paper focused its attention on optimization of fermentation conditions (in particular a vegan grade media using Design of Experiment approach) using fed-batch and microfiltration processes increasing the production of biomass and bioactive molecules, with respect to the batch processes. At the end of the fed-batch fermentation, a downstream process based on membranes was performed in order to obtain bioactive molecules that proved antimicrobial activity against intestinal/food spoilage pathogens. 
651 4 |a Italy 
651 4 |a France 
651 4 |a Switzerland 
653 |a Bacteria 
653 |a Food products 
653 |a Dairy industry 
653 |a Fed batch 
653 |a Food spoilage 
653 |a Dairy products 
653 |a Batch culture 
653 |a Cheese 
653 |a Lactic acid bacteria 
653 |a Biological activity 
653 |a Fermentation 
653 |a Spoilage 
653 |a Starter cultures 
653 |a Biotechnology 
653 |a Batch processes 
653 |a Lactic acid 
653 |a E coli 
653 |a Gastrointestinal system 
653 |a Pathogens 
653 |a Design of experiments 
653 |a Fermented milk products 
653 |a Productivity 
653 |a Biomass 
653 |a Ultrafiltration 
653 |a Batch processing 
653 |a Intestine 
653 |a Microfiltration 
653 |a Dry cells 
653 |a Cow's milk 
653 |a Milk 
653 |a Process controls 
653 |a Vegan 
653 |a Veganism 
653 |a Glucose 
653 |a Antimicrobial agents 
653 |a Lactose 
653 |a Metabolites 
653 |a Antimicrobial activity 
653 |a Economic 
653 |a Lactococcus lactis 
653 |a Environmental 
700 1 |a Parecha, Darshankumar 
700 1 |a Fusco, Alessandra 
700 1 |a Savio, Vittoria 
700 1 |a Ida De Chiara 
700 1 |a Muscariello, Lidia 
700 1 |a Donnarumma, Giovanna 
700 1 |a Schiraldi, Chiara 
773 0 |t BMC Biotechnology  |g vol. 25 (2025), p. 1-15 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Health & Medical Collection 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227639968/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227639968/fulltext/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227639968/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch