Optimizing net-zero energy strategies in airports through a hybrid multi-method framework

שמור ב:
מידע ביבליוגרפי
הוצא לאור ב:Scientific Reports (Nature Publisher Group) vol. 15, no. 1 (2025), p. 27732-27767
מחבר ראשי: Mizrak, Filiz
מחברים אחרים: Mizrak, Kagan Cenk, Karakaya, Turhan
יצא לאור:
Nature Publishing Group
נושאים:
גישה מקוונת:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
תגים: הוספת תג
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3234543463
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2045-2322 
024 7 |a 10.1038/s41598-025-12438-0  |2 doi 
035 |a 3234543463 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 274855  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Mizrak, Filiz  |u Management Information Systems (MIS), Atlas University, Istanbul, Turkey (ROR: https://ror.org/02jqzm779) (ISNI: 0000 0004 7863 4273) 
245 1 |a Optimizing net-zero energy strategies in airports through a hybrid multi-method framework 
260 |b Nature Publishing Group  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a This study introduces a hybrid decision-making framework to evaluate and prioritize energy retrofit strategies in airport infrastructure, addressing the dual goals of sustainability and operational feasibility. The proposed model integrates the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) for generating Pareto-optimal solutions, K-Means clustering for classifying strategies, and the Pythagorean Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (PFAHP) for prioritizing alternatives under uncertainty. The framework was applied to a representative mid-sized international airport scenario, constrained by a maximum budget of $1 million, implementation timelines of up to 18 months, and an operational disruption threshold of 3 on a 5-point scale. Nine distinct retrofit strategies were identified, with costs ranging from $850,000 to $1,000,000 and energy savings between 20% (250,000 kWh) and 30% (360,000 kWh) annually. Carbon reductions ranged from 15% (approximately 102 metric tons per year) to 30% (around 144 metric tons per year), while implementation times varied from 6.16 to 11.92 months. Disruption levels ranged from minimal (1.23) to moderate (5.00). Among these, Solution 9 achieved the highest overall priority score (0.708), offering 30% energy and carbon savings at a cost of $1,000,000, with an 11.03-month timeline and moderate disruption level (4.09). Cluster analysis grouped solutions into three profiles: low-cost (average cost $859,375, energy savings 20.63%), balanced (average cost $906,250, energy savings 23.75%), and high-impact (average cost $973,750, energy savings up to 30%). Sensitivity analysis further confirmed the robustness of the prioritization, with only minor score fluctuations under adjusted scenarios. These findings provide concrete, actionable guidance for airport decision-makers to support strategic energy retrofit investments aligned with ICAO’s CORSIA framework and UN Sustainable Development Goals, enabling tangible progress toward net-zero operations. 
610 4 |a United Nations--UN 
653 |a SWOT analysis 
653 |a Fuzzy sets 
653 |a Emissions 
653 |a Optimization techniques 
653 |a Aviation 
653 |a Environmental impact 
653 |a Energy conservation 
653 |a Pareto optimum 
653 |a Airports 
653 |a Wind power 
653 |a Artificial intelligence 
653 |a Infrastructure 
653 |a Alternative energy 
653 |a Sustainable development 
653 |a Decision making 
653 |a Planning 
653 |a Renewable resources 
653 |a Multiple criteria decision making 
653 |a Energy management 
653 |a Classification 
653 |a Sensitivity analysis 
653 |a Game theory 
653 |a Geographic information systems 
653 |a Energy efficiency 
653 |a HVAC 
653 |a Carbon 
653 |a Stakeholders 
653 |a Net zero 
653 |a Sustainable Development Goals 
653 |a Economic 
700 1 |a Mizrak, Kagan Cenk  |u Aviation Management, Nisantasi University, Istanbul, Turkey (ROR: https://ror.org/04tah3159) (GRID: grid.449484.1) (ISNI: 0000 0004 4648 9446) 
700 1 |a Karakaya, Turhan  |u Enviromental Protection Technologies, Dogus University, Istanbul, Turkey (ROR: https://ror.org/0272rjm42) (GRID: grid.19680.36) (ISNI: 0000 0001 0842 3532) 
773 0 |t Scientific Reports (Nature Publisher Group)  |g vol. 15, no. 1 (2025), p. 27732-27767 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3234543463/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3234543463/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3234543463/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch