Hybrid Teacher Training in Arduino-Based Science Education across Different Modalities

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Publicado no:Science Education International vol. 36, no. 2 (2025), p. 234
Autor principal: Lia Laela Sarah
Outros Autores: Shaw, Greg, Suhandi, Andi, Kaniawati, Ida, Mubiar Agustin
Publicado em:
International Council of Associations for Science Education
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:Citation/Abstract
Full text outside of ProQuest
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3237393059
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1450-104X 
035 |a 3237393059 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a EJ1478476 
100 1 |a Lia Laela Sarah 
245 1 |a Hybrid Teacher Training in Arduino-Based Science Education across Different Modalities 
260 |b International Council of Associations for Science Education  |c 2025 
513 |a Report Article 
520 3 |a In science education, educators frequently encounter the challenges of inadequate resources, equipment, and pedagogical strategies when planning and executing science projects in classrooms. To address this pervasive issue, forty-one science teachers participated in a training workshop to acquire expertise using Arduino microcontrollers and sensors as instrumental tools for scientific educational experiments. Of the participants, 18 engaged in face-to-face instruction, while others embraced online learning through synchronous platforms, such as Zoom, and asynchronous media, such as Google Classroom. The training consisted of three sections, including science pedagogy and the Arduino context for each session. To evaluate the training results, science teacher participants had to complete the assignment in the pedagogical context and the Arduino science project. Our findings illuminate a disparity in completion rates between online and face-to-face modes of instruction, with 41% of teachers succeeding in the former and a notably higher 79% in the online form. This study underscores the nuanced challenges encountered when incorporating teaching tools into science education activities, irrespective of the instructional mode. The challenges that participants faced included effective translation of wiring diagrams to physical circuits, resolution of coding errors, mitigation of connectivity issues between the Arduino equipment and computers, and challenges in structuring instructional steps that are essential for the successful implementation of Arduino-based science teaching. Nevertheless, 85% of educators expressed a shared perspective on the viability of Arduino tools as instruments for enriching the landscape of science education. 
651 4 |a Indonesia 
653 |a Science Education 
653 |a Blended Learning 
653 |a Science Teachers 
653 |a Faculty Development 
653 |a Science Experiments 
653 |a Educational Technology 
653 |a In Person Learning 
653 |a Electronic Learning 
653 |a Science Instruction 
653 |a Teacher Attitudes 
653 |a High School Teachers 
653 |a Junior High School Teachers 
653 |a Foreign Countries 
700 1 |a Shaw, Greg 
700 1 |a Suhandi, Andi 
700 1 |a Kaniawati, Ida 
700 1 |a Mubiar Agustin 
773 0 |t Science Education International  |g vol. 36, no. 2 (2025), p. 234 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ERIC 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3237393059/abstract/embedded/J7RWLIQ9I3C9JK51?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full text outside of ProQuest  |u http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1478476