Saudi Female EFL University Students’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools to Improve Reading Fluency and Digital Literacy: ChatGPT as an Example
Zapisane w:
| Wydane w: | International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies vol. 13, no. 3 (2025), p. 14-28 |
|---|---|
| 1. autor: | |
| Wydane: |
Australian International Academic Centre PTY. Ltd (AIAC)
|
| Hasła przedmiotowe: | |
| Dostęp online: | Citation/Abstract Full Text - PDF |
| Etykiety: |
Nie ma etykietki, Dołącz pierwszą etykiete!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3239565079 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2202-9478 | ||
| 035 | |a 3239565079 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 270131 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Maha Abdulmalik Althobaiti | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Saudi Female EFL University Students’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools to Improve Reading Fluency and Digital Literacy: ChatGPT as an Example | |
| 260 | |b Australian International Academic Centre PTY. Ltd (AIAC) |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a This study investigates Saudi female EFL university students' perceptions of ChatGPT as a tool for enhancing reading fluency, a persistent challenge in Saudi EFL education. A quantitative survey of 61 participants assessed ChatGPT across five domains: usability, fluency support, word recognition, engagement, and feedback. Results indicated strong positive perceptions overall (M = 4.53), with the highest ratings for word recognition/comprehension (M = 4.59) and usability (M = 4.56). Feedback (M = 4.54) and engagement (M = 4.50) were also highly valued, though fluency-specific impacts were slightly lower (M = 4.43), implying ChatGPT’s indirect benefits via vocabulary and motivation. The study concludes that ChatGPT effectively complements traditional instruction but recommends structured fluency exercises for optimal outcomes. These findings offer practical insights for EFL educators and underscore the need for longitudinal research on AI’s role in fluency and digital literacy development in reading contexts. | |
| 653 | |a Feedback | ||
| 653 | |a Comprehension | ||
| 653 | |a Fluency | ||
| 653 | |a College students | ||
| 653 | |a Digital literacy | ||
| 653 | |a Artificial intelligence | ||
| 653 | |a Human-computer interaction | ||
| 653 | |a Perceptions | ||
| 653 | |a Second language reading | ||
| 653 | |a Word recognition | ||
| 653 | |a Computer assisted language learning | ||
| 653 | |a Females | ||
| 653 | |a English as a second language instruction | ||
| 653 | |a Reading instruction | ||
| 653 | |a Usability | ||
| 653 | |a Language acquisition | ||
| 653 | |a English as a second language | ||
| 653 | |a University students | ||
| 653 | |a Foreign language learning | ||
| 653 | |a Influence | ||
| 653 | |a Chatbots | ||
| 653 | |a Motivation | ||
| 653 | |a Hypotheses | ||
| 653 | |a Vocabulary development | ||
| 653 | |a Literature reviews | ||
| 653 | |a Education | ||
| 653 | |a Internet | ||
| 653 | |a Teachers | ||
| 653 | |a Teaching | ||
| 653 | |a Acknowledgment | ||
| 653 | |a Vocabulary | ||
| 653 | |a Social | ||
| 653 | |a Conventional Instruction | ||
| 653 | |a Reading Fluency | ||
| 653 | |a English (Second Language) | ||
| 653 | |a Reading Improvement | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies |g vol. 13, no. 3 (2025), p. 14-28 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Health & Medical Collection | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3239565079/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3239565079/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |