Enhancing Learning in Microelectronic Circuits: Integrating LTspice Simulations and Structured Reflections in a Design Project
Spremljeno u:
| Izdano u: | Education Sciences vol. 15, no. 8 (2025), p. 1045-1064 |
|---|---|
| Glavni autor: | |
| Izdano: |
MDPI AG
|
| Teme: | |
| Online pristup: | Citation/Abstract Full Text + Graphics Full Text - PDF |
| Oznake: |
Bez oznaka, Budi prvi tko označuje ovaj zapis!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3244010229 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2227-7102 | ||
| 022 | |a 2076-3344 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/educsci15081045 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3244010229 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 231457 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Shekh-Abed Aziz |u Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Hadera 4025000, Israel; azizs@ruppin.ac.il | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Enhancing Learning in Microelectronic Circuits: Integrating LTspice Simulations and Structured Reflections in a Design Project | |
| 260 | |b MDPI AG |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a This study investigates the integration of LTspice simulations and structured reflective practices within a project-based learning (PBL) framework in a Microelectronic Circuits course. The course was designed to improve students’ conceptual understanding, problem-solving abilities, and engagement by embedding simulation-based assignments and guided reflections within a final design project. A qualitative case study was conducted with 49 third-year undergraduate electrical engineering students. The data sources included structured reflection submissions, researcher observations, and evaluations of project presentations. Thematic analysis identified five recurring themes: linking theory to practice, iterative problem-solving strategies, metacognitive awareness, peer engagement, and reflections on integration challenges and benefits. The results indicate that the LTspice simulations enabled the students to visualize circuit behavior, experiment with design parameters, and observe the effects of design trade-offs. The integration of structured reflection prompted deeper learning by helping the students recognize misconceptions, articulate troubleshooting strategies, and build confidence in circuit analysis. Although some students initially struggled with the complexity of the simulation software, the iterative and collaborative nature of the PBL process increased their motivation and promoted meaningful engagement. This study contributes to the growing body of research on active learning in engineering education and offers practical recommendations for implementing simulation-based learning environments that promote critical thinking, metacognition, and technical competence. | |
| 653 | |a Problem solving | ||
| 653 | |a Pedagogy | ||
| 653 | |a Software | ||
| 653 | |a Students | ||
| 653 | |a Curricula | ||
| 653 | |a Instructional design | ||
| 653 | |a Circuits | ||
| 653 | |a Feedback | ||
| 653 | |a Skills | ||
| 653 | |a Simulation | ||
| 653 | |a Embedded systems | ||
| 653 | |a Active learning | ||
| 653 | |a Computer engineering | ||
| 653 | |a Engineering education | ||
| 653 | |a Metacognition | ||
| 653 | |a Critical thinking | ||
| 653 | |a Problem based learning | ||
| 653 | |a Qualitative research | ||
| 653 | |a Computer Simulation | ||
| 653 | |a Authentic Learning | ||
| 653 | |a Reflection | ||
| 653 | |a Lecture Method | ||
| 653 | |a Learning Processes | ||
| 653 | |a Cognitive Processes | ||
| 653 | |a Learning Theories | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Technology | ||
| 653 | |a Electronic Equipment | ||
| 653 | |a Simulated Environment | ||
| 653 | |a Pattern Recognition | ||
| 653 | |a Feedback (Response) | ||
| 653 | |a Reflective Teaching | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Objectives | ||
| 653 | |a Electronics | ||
| 653 | |a Outcomes of Education | ||
| 653 | |a Course Content | ||
| 653 | |a Learner Engagement | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Strategies | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t Education Sciences |g vol. 15, no. 8 (2025), p. 1045-1064 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Education Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3244010229/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text + Graphics |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3244010229/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3244010229/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |