Digital Dentistry and Imaging: Comparing the Performance of Smartphone and Professional Cameras for Clinical Use

Zapisane w:
Opis bibliograficzny
Wydane w:Prosthesis vol. 7, no. 4 (2025), p. 77-93
1. autor: Hasbini Omar
Kolejni autorzy: Rim, Bourgi, Kharouf Naji, Cuevas-Suárez, Carlos Enrique, Kharma Khalil, Moussa, Carol, Nassar, Nicolas, Osman Aly, Lukomska-Szymanska Monika, Haikel Youssef, Hardan Louis
Wydane:
MDPI AG
Hasła przedmiotowe:
Dostęp online:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Etykiety: Dodaj etykietę
Nie ma etykietki, Dołącz pierwszą etykiete!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3244055974
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2673-1592 
024 7 |a 10.3390/prosthesis7040077  |2 doi 
035 |a 3244055974 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
100 1 |a Hasbini Omar  |u Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2180, Lebanon; omar.hasbini@net.usj.edu.lb 
245 1 |a Digital Dentistry and Imaging: Comparing the Performance of Smartphone and Professional Cameras for Clinical Use 
260 |b MDPI AG  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Background: Digital dental photography is increasingly essential for documentation and smile design. This study aimed to compare the linear measurement accuracy of various smartphones and a Digital Single-Lens Reflex (DSLR) camera against digital models obtained by intraoral and desktop scanners. Methods: Tooth height and width from six different casts were measured and compared using images acquired with a Canon EOS 250D DSLR, six smartphone models (iPhone 13, iPhone 15, Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S24, and Vivo T2), and digital scans obtained from the Helios 500 intraoral scanner and the Ceramill Map 600 desktop scanner. All image measurements were performed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), and statistical analysis was conducted using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test (α = 0.05). Results: The results showed no significant differences in measurements across most imaging methods (p > 0.05), except for the Vivo T2, which showed a significant deviation (p < 0.05). The other smartphones produced measurements comparable to those of the DSLR, even at distances as close as 16 cm. Conclusions: These findings preliminary support the clinical use of smartphones for accurate dental documentation and two-dimensional smile design, including the posterior areas, and challenge the previously recommended 24 cm minimum distance for mobile dental photography (MDP). This provides clinicians with a simplified and accessible alternative for high-accuracy dental imaging, advancing the everyday use of MDP in clinical practice. 
610 4 |a Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 
651 4 |a Beirut Lebanon 
651 4 |a United States--US 
651 4 |a China 
651 4 |a Lebanon 
653 |a Software 
653 |a Cameras 
653 |a Photographs 
653 |a Learning curves 
653 |a Smartphones 
653 |a Scanners 
653 |a Photography 
653 |a Dentistry 
653 |a Teeth 
653 |a Variance analysis 
700 1 |a Rim, Bourgi  |u Department of Restorative and Esthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2180, Lebanon; khalil.kharma@usj.edu.lb (K.K.); louis.hardan@usj.edu.lb (L.H.) 
700 1 |a Kharouf Naji  |u Department of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S 1121, University of Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France; dentistenajikharouf@gmail.com (N.K.); youssef.haikel@unistra.fr (Y.H.) 
700 1 |a Cuevas-Suárez, Carlos Enrique  |u Dental Materials Laboratory, Academic Area of Dentistry, Autonomous University of Hidalgo State, San Agustín Tlaxiaca 42160, Mexico 
700 1 |a Kharma Khalil  |u Department of Restorative and Esthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2180, Lebanon; khalil.kharma@usj.edu.lb (K.K.); louis.hardan@usj.edu.lb (L.H.) 
700 1 |a Moussa, Carol  |u Faculty of Dentistry, University of Tours, 37032 Tours, France; carol.moussa@univ-tours.fr 
700 1 |a Nassar, Nicolas  |u Department of Digital Dentistry, AI, and Evolving Technologies, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2180, Lebanon; nicolas.nassar.dds@hotmail.com 
700 1 |a Osman Aly  |u &lt;label&gt;12&lt;/label&gt;Department of Developmental Sciences, Orthodontic Division, Beirut Arab University, Beirut 1107 2809, Lebanon; a.osman@bau.edu.lb 
700 1 |a Lukomska-Szymanska Monika  |u &lt;label&gt;13&lt;/label&gt;Department of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, Poland; monika.lukomska-szymanska@umed.lodz.pl 
700 1 |a Haikel Youssef  |u Department of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S 1121, University of Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France; dentistenajikharouf@gmail.com (N.K.); youssef.haikel@unistra.fr (Y.H.) 
700 1 |a Hardan Louis  |u Department of Restorative and Esthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2180, Lebanon; khalil.kharma@usj.edu.lb (K.K.); louis.hardan@usj.edu.lb (L.H.) 
773 0 |t Prosthesis  |g vol. 7, no. 4 (2025), p. 77-93 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Health & Medical Collection 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3244055974/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3244055974/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3244055974/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch