Нүүр зураг

Digital Dentistry and Imaging: Comparing the Performance of Smartphone and Professional Cameras for Clinical Use

-д хадгалсан:
-д хэвлэсэн:Prosthesis vol. 7, no. 4 (2025), p. 77-93
Үндсэн зохиолч: Hasbini Omar
Бусад зохиолчид: Rim, Bourgi, Kharouf Naji, Cuevas-Suárez, Carlos Enrique, Kharma Khalil, Moussa, Carol, Nassar, Nicolas, Osman Aly, Lukomska-Szymanska Monika, Haikel Youssef, Hardan Louis
Хэвлэсэн:
MDPI AG
Нөхцлүүд:
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
Beirut Lebanon
United States > US
China
Lebanon
Software
Cameras
Photographs
Learning curves
Smartphones
Scanners
Photography
Dentistry
Teeth
Variance analysis
Онлайн хандалт:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Шошгууд: Шошго нэмэх
Шошго байхгүй, Энэхүү баримтыг шошголох эхний хүн болох!
Хураангуй:Background: Digital dental photography is increasingly essential for documentation and smile design. This study aimed to compare the linear measurement accuracy of various smartphones and a Digital Single-Lens Reflex (DSLR) camera against digital models obtained by intraoral and desktop scanners. Methods: Tooth height and width from six different casts were measured and compared using images acquired with a Canon EOS 250D DSLR, six smartphone models (iPhone 13, iPhone 15, Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S24, and Vivo T2), and digital scans obtained from the Helios 500 intraoral scanner and the Ceramill Map 600 desktop scanner. All image measurements were performed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), and statistical analysis was conducted using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test (α = 0.05). Results: The results showed no significant differences in measurements across most imaging methods (p > 0.05), except for the Vivo T2, which showed a significant deviation (p < 0.05). The other smartphones produced measurements comparable to those of the DSLR, even at distances as close as 16 cm. Conclusions: These findings preliminary support the clinical use of smartphones for accurate dental documentation and two-dimensional smile design, including the posterior areas, and challenge the previously recommended 24 cm minimum distance for mobile dental photography (MDP). This provides clinicians with a simplified and accessible alternative for high-accuracy dental imaging, advancing the everyday use of MDP in clinical practice.
ISSN:2673-1592
DOI:10.3390/prosthesis7040077
Эх сурвалж:Health & Medical Collection