The use of a cognitive behavioural model of reflection to facilitate transformative learning in undergraduate nursing education. The quantitative results of a mixed methods study
Guardat en:
| Publicat a: | Nurse Education in Practice vol. 87 (Aug 2025), p. 104444-104451 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Altres autors: | , , |
| Publicat: |
Elsevier Limited
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetes: |
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3244814736 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1471-5953 | ||
| 022 | |a 1873-5223 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104444 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3244814736 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250801 |b d20250831 | |
| 084 | |a 170342 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Batterbee, Robert |u Central Queensland University & Murdoch University Australia, Australia | |
| 245 | 1 | |a The use of a cognitive behavioural model of reflection to facilitate transformative learning in undergraduate nursing education. The quantitative results of a mixed methods study | |
| 260 | |b Elsevier Limited |c Aug 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Aim This study examined whether a cognitive behavioural approach to critical reflection could facilitate transformative learning in nursing students compared with a traditional reflective model. Background Critical reflection is essential in nursing practice and education. While transformative learning theory (TLT) has the potential to facilitate deeper learning, its application in nursing education remains underexplored. Cognitive behavioural approaches have successfully promoted critical reflection in other clinical professions but have yet to be used in nursing education. Design A quasi-experimental mixed methods design was employed. This paper reports the quantitative findings. Methods Two groups od second year undergraduate nursing students were compared: the experimental group received a cognitive behavioural approach, while the control group received a traditional reflective model. The Self-Reflection and Insight Scale (SRIS) measured outcomes at baseline, post-intervention and follow up. Response rates were 88.5 % (n = 139) for the experimental group and 93 % (n = 169) for the control group. Data were analysed using Linear mixed-effects models. Results Significant differences were observed in insight, engagement in reflection and perceived need to reflect. The cognitive behavioural approach led to a highly significant increase in reflective insight, with scores improving by 5.54 units from baseline to follow-up (p < 0.001). Conclusions These findings indicated that the cognitive behavioural approach facilitated critical reflection, particularly in developing insight and metacognitive skills. A separate qualitative analysis examining the utility of the approach will offer further insight into how this approach supported transformative learning. | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Australia | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Western Australia Australia | |
| 653 | |a Behavior | ||
| 653 | |a Students | ||
| 653 | |a Cognitive behavioral therapy | ||
| 653 | |a Reflective practice | ||
| 653 | |a Influence | ||
| 653 | |a Medical education | ||
| 653 | |a Professional practice | ||
| 653 | |a Learning | ||
| 653 | |a Critical thinking | ||
| 653 | |a Metacognition | ||
| 653 | |a Nursing education | ||
| 653 | |a Clinical medicine | ||
| 653 | |a Selfreflection | ||
| 653 | |a Quasi-experimental methods | ||
| 653 | |a Self awareness | ||
| 653 | |a Emotions | ||
| 653 | |a Mixed methods research | ||
| 653 | |a Skills | ||
| 653 | |a Qualitative research | ||
| 653 | |a Cognitive-behavioral factors | ||
| 653 | |a Data collection | ||
| 653 | |a Clinical nursing | ||
| 653 | |a Reflection | ||
| 653 | |a Professions | ||
| 653 | |a College students | ||
| 653 | |a Education | ||
| 653 | |a Cognition | ||
| 653 | |a Nurses | ||
| 653 | |a Learning theories | ||
| 653 | |a Research methodology | ||
| 653 | |a Nursing | ||
| 653 | |a Groups | ||
| 653 | |a Prior Learning | ||
| 653 | |a Cognitive Processes | ||
| 653 | |a Researchers | ||
| 653 | |a Reliability | ||
| 653 | |a Pattern Recognition | ||
| 653 | |a Reflective Teaching | ||
| 653 | |a Psychological Patterns | ||
| 653 | |a Evaluative Thinking | ||
| 653 | |a Learning Objectives | ||
| 653 | |a Control Groups | ||
| 653 | |a Nursing Students | ||
| 653 | |a Ethics | ||
| 653 | |a Feedback (Response) | ||
| 653 | |a Beliefs | ||
| 653 | |a Professional Development | ||
| 653 | |a Data Analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Grounded Theory | ||
| 653 | |a Longitudinal Studies | ||
| 653 | |a Emotional Response | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Bradshaw, Julie |u Central Queensland University, Australia | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Frost, Andrew |u Ara Institute of Canterbury, New Zealand | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hunt, Susan |u Swinburne University, Australia | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Nurse Education in Practice |g vol. 87 (Aug 2025), p. 104444-104451 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Sociology Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3244814736/abstract/embedded/Q8Z64E4HU3OH5N8U?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3244814736/fulltext/embedded/Q8Z64E4HU3OH5N8U?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3244814736/fulltextPDF/embedded/Q8Z64E4HU3OH5N8U?source=fedsrch |