Imagen de Portada

Measuring the impact of The Australian National Placement Evaluation Centre to enhance nursing and midwifery student clinical placements: A multimodal evaluation

Guardado en:
Publicado en:Nurse Education in Practice vol. 87 (Aug 2025), p. 104505-104514
Autor principal: Ryan, Colleen
Otros Autores: Cant, Robyn, Hyun, Areum, Procter, Debbie, Alexander, Louise, Bloxsome, Dianne, Hughes, Lynda, Bogossian, Fiona, Cooper, Simon
Publicado:
Elsevier Limited
Materias:
World Health Organization
Australia
Quality management
Students
Websites
Midwifery
Midwifery education
Conferences
Validity
Midwives
Quality improvement
Clinical placements
Polls & surveys
Stakeholders
Nursing
Learning
School environment
Supervisors
Feedback
Multimodality
Health care
Social media
Visitors
Clinical nursing
Email
Responses
Professions
Mass media effects
Data quality
Registration
Nurses
Evaluation
Data collection
Health services
Education
Learning outcomes
Statistics
Literature Reviews
Participant Characteristics
Authors
Supervisory Methods
Evidence Based Practice
Comparative Education
Comparative Analysis
Obstetrics
Educational Environment
Individual Characteristics
Educational Quality
Sequential Approach
Learning Experience
Mail Surveys
Ethics
Feedback (Response)
Student Surveys
Data Analysis
Information Sources
Recruitment
Educational Facilities Improvement
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Resumen:Aim To evaluate the early impact of the Centre. Background The educational quality of nursing and midwifery student clinical placement learning varies. The National Placement Evaluation Centre has a pivotal role in quality improvement by systematically collecting student and supervisor feedback on placement experiences. Design Multimodal impact evaluation. Methods Data were collected from website analytics and a survey shared via stakeholder registration emails and social media. The Impact Management Planning and Evaluation Ladder model was used to understand impact. Data were analysed using a sequential, hybrid inductive/deductive approach. Descriptive statistics summarised participant characteristics and qualitative data were themed. Results Website analytics revealed Centre visitors were from 92 countries, with most reviewing placement evaluation tools. Registered NPEC members represented 37 Australian education and 590 placement providers and together they accessed their data 6213 times. There was n = 107 survey responses. Thematic analysis revealed four themes describing user experiences, enhancements to placements and recommendations for system improvements: 1) A valued system, 2) Barriers to engagement, 3) Resulting changes and 4) It’s early days! The deductive analysis revealed far reaching national impact. Conclusions The Australian National Placement Evaluation Centre impact is amplified by its nationally consistent reach. Data collection via validated placement evaluation tools and streamlined data reporting informs improvements to the quality of nursing and midwifery clinical placements. Increased promotion of the NPEC to students is needed. The Centre has the potential to enhance clinical placement quality across national and international healthcare professions. Promotion to students is necessary. Future directions are reported.
ISSN:1471-5953
1873-5223
DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104505
Fuente:Sociology Database