Promoting collaborative reflection to foster interprofessional collaboration skills: Putting laboratory findings to the test in the field

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Publicat a:International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education vol. 22, no. 1 (Dec 2025), p. 54
Autor principal: Strauß, Sebastian
Altres autors: Tunnigkeit, Isis, Eberle, Julia, Avdullahu, Arlind, Block, Marlena, König, Markus, Rummel, Nikol
Publicat:
Springer Nature B.V.
Matèries:
Accés en línia:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3246748382
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2365-9440 
022 |a 1698-580X 
024 7 |a 10.1186/s41239-025-00553-x  |2 doi 
035 |a 3246748382 
045 2 |b d20251201  |b d20251231 
084 |a 142233  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Strauß, Sebastian  |u Ruhr-University Bochum, Institute for Educational Science, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.5570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0490 981X) 
245 1 |a Promoting collaborative reflection to foster interprofessional collaboration skills: Putting laboratory findings to the test in the field 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c Dec 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Finding ways to support learners in becoming effective collaborators is a key challenge in higher education. Educational technologies can help to achieve this goal. However, the effectiveness of pedagogical design principles underlying these technologies needs to be tested empirically to inform evidence-based teaching in higher education. In the present study, we examine the effect of a technologically-supported collaborative reflection activity on learners’ knowledge gain about effective collaboration and about the quality of their interaction. To this end, we compare the results of a field study that was conducted in a course for civil engineering students (n = 66), with results of a laboratory study with n = 57 university students. Both field and laboratory study consisted of two collaborative problem-solving phases, in which students worked in small groups to solve information pooling problems. Multilevel modeling indicates that the technology-supported collaborative reflection activity between the two collaborative problem-solving phases increased explicit knowledge about effective collaboration. The quality of collaboration during subsequent collaboration, however, was not affected. Further, we found that groups’ self-assessments were in line with expert ratings of their collaboration quality. We discuss these findings in terms of the learning mechanisms behind technology-supported collaborative reflection and the extent to which these forms of support foster collaboration skills. Thus, our study adds insights on how to join educational technologies with pedagogical design principles to support collaborative learning. 
653 |a Problem solving 
653 |a Teaching 
653 |a Students 
653 |a Collaboration 
653 |a Instructional design 
653 |a Skills 
653 |a Laboratories 
653 |a Educational technology 
653 |a Colleges & universities 
653 |a Education 
653 |a Knowledge 
653 |a Self assessment 
653 |a Effectiveness 
653 |a Information processing 
653 |a Higher education 
653 |a Investigations 
653 |a Knowledge management 
653 |a Feedback 
653 |a Learning 
653 |a Collaborative learning 
653 |a College students 
653 |a Technology 
653 |a Self evaluation 
653 |a Civil engineering 
653 |a Fieldwork 
653 |a Interagency collaboration 
653 |a Information technology 
653 |a Small groups 
653 |a Cooperative learning 
653 |a Academic achievement 
653 |a Interdisciplinary aspects 
653 |a Learning Analytics 
653 |a Educational Practices 
653 |a Literature Reviews 
653 |a Educational Research 
653 |a Prior Learning 
653 |a Direct Instruction 
653 |a Communication (Thought Transfer) 
653 |a Goal Orientation 
653 |a Replication (Evaluation) 
653 |a Laboratory Experiments 
653 |a Evidence Based Practice 
653 |a Learner Engagement 
653 |a Authentic Learning 
653 |a Coordination 
653 |a Influence of Technology 
653 |a Reflection 
653 |a Teaching Methods 
653 |a Computers 
653 |a Outcomes of Education 
700 1 |a Tunnigkeit, Isis  |u Ruhr-University Bochum, Institute for Educational Science, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.5570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0490 981X) 
700 1 |a Eberle, Julia  |u Department of Educational Science, Paris-Lodron-University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria (GRID:grid.7039.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 6330) 
700 1 |a Avdullahu, Arlind  |u Ruhr-University Bochum, Institute for Educational Science, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.5570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0490 981X) 
700 1 |a Block, Marlena  |u Ruhr-University Bochum, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.5570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0490 981X) 
700 1 |a König, Markus  |u Ruhr-University Bochum, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.5570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0490 981X) 
700 1 |a Rummel, Nikol  |u Ruhr-University Bochum, Institute for Educational Science, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.5570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0490 981X); Center for Advanced Internet Studies (CAIS), Educational Technologies and Artificial Intelligence, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.512729.a) 
773 0 |t International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education  |g vol. 22, no. 1 (Dec 2025), p. 54 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Political Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3246748382/abstract/embedded/Q8Z64E4HU3OH5N8U?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3246748382/fulltext/embedded/Q8Z64E4HU3OH5N8U?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3246748382/fulltextPDF/embedded/Q8Z64E4HU3OH5N8U?source=fedsrch