Assessing the effect of educational intervention on pharmaceutical promotion: a follow-up study among medical students from Pakistan
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | BMC Medical Education vol. 25 (2025), p. 1-15 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature B.V.
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3247111503 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1472-6920 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12909-025-07725-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3247111503 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 58506 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ali Hassan Gillani | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Assessing the effect of educational intervention on pharmaceutical promotion: a follow-up study among medical students from Pakistan | |
| 260 | |b Springer Nature B.V. |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a BackgroundThe promotional strategies implemented by pharmaceutical organizations lead to abnormal prescribing practices that both diminish physician-patient confidence and drive-up healthcare expenses. The motives of the pharmaceutical companies are to appeal students’ natural preferences. So, educating them represents an essential approach to combat these effects. Research provides few examples of educational programs while their long term sustained benefit has not been established over time. This research investigated how educational programs affect students in the short- and long-term after exposure to pharmaceutical promotional activities.MethodsThe study was conducted longitudinally across 7 schools within three provinces of Pakistan. Survey data collection took place from 856 medical students of the 3rd year class of term 2021–2022 and 2022–2023 for pre-post educational assessment. We performed two-year follow-up surveys which asked the same questions to these 2 cohorts to determine both the clinical rotations’ impact and various promotional methods on their responses. We measured the opinions of 819 students who completed their last year and did not take part in the educational intervention to compare with those taking it. Analysis of each individual point in all comparison sets occurred through SPSS version 23.0.ResultsStudent perception along with business approach towards promotional strategies underwent significant modifications throughout the short-term period. The educational method lost its effectiveness at convincing students about avoiding financial support from pharmaceutical companies in the long-term period (median 2(1) to 2(0) p:0.049). Educated students displayed superior knowledge about how trivial gifts affect medication decisions over uneducated final year students (2 (0) to 3 (0) p < 0.001). In the group with high promotion exposure the educated students-maintained awareness about trivial gift influences (p < 0.001) but uneducated students believed they were unaffected by such promotions (p < 0.001).ConclusionAn education program could serve as a platform to build pharmaceutical promotion awareness alongside promoting skepticism levels and developing positive perceptions about pharmaceutical promotion methods. The educational intervention faces a high risk of becoming ineffective when students interact with the informal and hidden curriculum and exposure to promotional activities. The impact of role models, organizational culture, and institutional policies could be important aspects to be addressed for sustaining the effectiveness of such education programs. | |
| 610 | 4 | |a American Medical Student Association | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Pakistan | |
| 653 | |a Teaching | ||
| 653 | |a Skepticism | ||
| 653 | |a Higher education | ||
| 653 | |a Curricula | ||
| 653 | |a Intervention | ||
| 653 | |a Pharmaceutical industry | ||
| 653 | |a Medical students | ||
| 653 | |a Colleges & universities | ||
| 653 | |a Public sector | ||
| 653 | |a Medical schools | ||
| 653 | |a Medicine | ||
| 653 | |a Regulation | ||
| 653 | |a Information sources | ||
| 653 | |a Guidelines | ||
| 653 | |a Supervision | ||
| 653 | |a Measures (Individuals) | ||
| 653 | |a Physicians | ||
| 653 | |a Advertising | ||
| 653 | |a Medical Education | ||
| 653 | |a Developed Nations | ||
| 653 | |a Followup Studies | ||
| 653 | |a Time | ||
| 653 | |a Program Development | ||
| 653 | |a Scientific and Technical Information | ||
| 653 | |a Program Implementation | ||
| 653 | |a Student Surveys | ||
| 653 | |a Student Participation | ||
| 653 | |a Private Sector | ||
| 653 | |a Hidden Curriculum | ||
| 653 | |a Attitude Change | ||
| 653 | |a National Standards | ||
| 653 | |a Coping | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Arshad, Hafsa | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Arshed, Muhammad | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ahmad, Nadeem | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Samkari, Jamil Adnan | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Muhammad Farooq Umer | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mujtaba, Hasan | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Iffat Batool | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Syed Burhan Samad Tarmizi | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Naveel Atif | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yang, Caijun | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yu, Fang | |
| 773 | 0 | |t BMC Medical Education |g vol. 25 (2025), p. 1-15 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Healthcare Administration Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3247111503/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3247111503/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3247111503/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |