Culturally Responsive Mathematics and Curriculum Materials: Present Realities and Imagined Futures

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Education Sciences vol. 15, no. 9 (2025), p. 1246-1274
Autor principal: Stone, Riley
Otros Autores: Smith, Ethan P, Ebner, Raisa J
Publicado:
MDPI AG
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3254509072
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2227-7102 
022 |a 2076-3344 
024 7 |a 10.3390/educsci15091246  |2 doi 
035 |a 3254509072 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 231457  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Stone, Riley  |u Mathematica, 600 Alexander Park Dr., Princeton, NJ 08540, USA 
245 1 |a Culturally Responsive Mathematics and Curriculum Materials: Present Realities and Imagined Futures 
260 |b MDPI AG  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a This study applies a culturally responsive lens to the analysis of middle school (i.e., grades for students aged 11–13) mathematics curriculum materials. Based on previous conceptual frameworks that describe Culturally Responsive Mathematics (CRM) as a multidimensional construct, we developed a tool, the CRM Materials Evidence Tool (CRM-MET), to indicate the extent of explicit guidance within written curriculum materials toward different dimensions of CRM. Six sets of middle school curriculum materials were analyzed using the CRM-MET, with results demonstrating distinct differences in how these materials attended to different dimensions of CRM. This analysis also indicated that there are notable gaps across all analyzed curricula, especially regarding more critical dimensions of CRM focused on power and participation. These results suggest that systems aimed at supporting teachers’ orientation toward and implementation of CRM can benefit from curriculum materials, but that the standardized nature of curriculum may also constrain the role of such materials in supporting CRM. We provide suggestions around how curriculum designers and school leaders might use curriculum strategically to support CRM given these findings, while recognizing policy constraints that may challenge such efforts. 
651 4 |a United States--US 
653 |a Teaching 
653 |a Students 
653 |a Curricula 
653 |a Addition & subtraction 
653 |a Learning 
653 |a Mathematics education 
653 |a Educational Opportunities 
653 |a Literature Reviews 
653 |a Curriculum Development 
653 |a Stakeholders 
653 |a Educational Resources 
653 |a Standardized Tests 
653 |a Public Schools 
653 |a Curriculum Design 
653 |a Academic Achievement 
653 |a Social Problems 
653 |a Student Experience 
653 |a School District Autonomy 
653 |a Social Justice 
653 |a Instructional Leadership 
653 |a Mathematics Curriculum 
653 |a Instructional Materials 
653 |a Mathematics Teachers 
653 |a Mathematics Activities 
653 |a Mathematics Instruction 
653 |a Student Participation 
653 |a State Standards 
653 |a Mathematics Materials 
653 |a Classrooms 
653 |a Resource Allocation 
700 1 |a Smith, Ethan P  |u College of Education, Sport, and Human Sciences, Washington State University Tri-Cities, 2710 Crimson Way, Richland, WA 99354, USA; ethan.p.smith@wsu.edu (E.P.S.); raisa.ebner@wsu.edu (R.J.E.) 
700 1 |a Ebner, Raisa J  |u College of Education, Sport, and Human Sciences, Washington State University Tri-Cities, 2710 Crimson Way, Richland, WA 99354, USA; ethan.p.smith@wsu.edu (E.P.S.); raisa.ebner@wsu.edu (R.J.E.) 
773 0 |t Education Sciences  |g vol. 15, no. 9 (2025), p. 1246-1274 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Education Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3254509072/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3254509072/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3254509072/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch