A Qualitative Exploration of Student Perceptions on the Use of AI in an Undergraduate Nursing Research Course
Guardado en:
| Udgivet i: | Journal of Nursing Education vol. 64, no. 10 (Oct 2025), p. 620 |
|---|---|
| Hovedforfatter: | |
| Udgivet: |
SLACK INCORPORATED
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Tags: |
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3257454319 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 0148-4834 | ||
| 022 | |a 1938-2421 | ||
| 022 | |a 0022-3158 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3928/01484834-20250519-03 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3257454319 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20251001 |b d20251031 | |
| 084 | |a 23497 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a DeNotto, Leigh Anne | |
| 245 | 1 | |a A Qualitative Exploration of Student Perceptions on the Use of AI in an Undergraduate Nursing Research Course | |
| 260 | |b SLACK INCORPORATED |c Oct 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into nursing education, yet limited research exists on students' perceptions of AI use in nursing research courses. This study explored undergraduate nursing students' experiences using AI tools (ChatGPT and U-M GPT) in research courses. Method: This qualitative descriptive study used Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis. Data were collected through anonymous written reflections from students enrolled in nursing research courses at two universities. Results: Five key themes emerged: (1) mixed initial perceptions; (2) shifting final perceptions; (3) AI strengths and limitations; (4) ethical concerns; and (5) use of AI in health care. Participants noted the potential of AI to enhance efficiency and provide feedback but expressed concerns about reliability, ethical use, and overreliance. Conclusion: Structured exposure to AI fostered positive perceptions of AI as a learning tool. Findings highlight the need for ethical frameworks and guidelines to support responsible integration, with future research exploring AI literacy and its implications for nursing education. | |
| 610 | 4 | |a OpenAI | |
| 653 | |a Problem solving | ||
| 653 | |a Nursing education | ||
| 653 | |a Clinical medicine | ||
| 653 | |a Student attitudes | ||
| 653 | |a Feedback | ||
| 653 | |a Generative artificial intelligence | ||
| 653 | |a Teachers | ||
| 653 | |a Chatbots | ||
| 653 | |a Personalized learning | ||
| 653 | |a Qualitative research | ||
| 653 | |a Learning | ||
| 653 | |a Artificial intelligence literacy | ||
| 653 | |a Critical Thinking | ||
| 653 | |a Undergraduate Students | ||
| 653 | |a Research Skills | ||
| 653 | |a Influence of Technology | ||
| 653 | |a Reflection | ||
| 653 | |a Researchers | ||
| 653 | |a Nursing Research | ||
| 653 | |a Learning Experience | ||
| 653 | |a Individualized Instruction | ||
| 653 | |a Grading | ||
| 653 | |a Nursing Students | ||
| 653 | |a Research Design | ||
| 653 | |a Feedback (Response) | ||
| 653 | |a Artificial Intelligence | ||
| 653 | |a Data Analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Comparative Education | ||
| 653 | |a Comparative Analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Language Processing | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Environment | ||
| 653 | |a Course Content | ||
| 653 | |a Research Methodology | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Needs | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t Journal of Nursing Education |g vol. 64, no. 10 (Oct 2025), p. 620 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Health & Medical Collection | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3257454319/abstract/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3257454319/fulltext/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3257454319/fulltextPDF/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch |