Copertina

Addressing Data Imbalance in Hydrological Machine Learning: Impact of Advanced Sampling Methods on Performance and Interpretability

Salvato in:
Pubblicato in:Water Resources Research vol. 61, no. 10 (Oct 1, 2025)
Autore principale: Yin, Xiaoran
Altri autori: Shu, Longcang, Wang, Zhe, Zhou, Long, Niu, Shuyao, Ren, Huazhun, Liu, Bo, Lu, Chengpeng
Pubblicazione:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Soggetti:
Hydrologic data
Datasets
Algorithms
Sampling methods
Soil properties
Hydraulic conductivity
Hydrology
Machine learning
Hypercubes
Random sampling
Performance evaluation
Learning algorithms
Contamination
Accuracy
Soil sciences
Training
Groundwater
Statistical sampling
Decision making
National forests
Hydraulics
Latin hypercube sampling
Environmental
Accesso online:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
Abstract:Data imbalance poses a severe challenge in hydrological machine learning (ML) applications by limiting model performance and interpretability, whereas solutions remain limited. This study evaluates the impact of advanced sampling methods, particularly feature space coverage sampling (FSCS), on model performance in predicting forest cover types and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks); mechanism underlying its efficacy; and impact on model interpretability. Using ML algorithms such as random forest (RF) and LightGBM (LGB) across various training set sizes, we demonstrated that FSCS significantly mitigates data imbalance, enhancing model accuracy, feature importance estimation, and interpretability. Two widely used hydrological data sets were analyzed: a large multiclass forest cover type data set from Roosevelt National Forest (110,393 samples) and continuous‐value data set of soil properties from the USKSAT database (18,729 samples). In total, 1,720 models were constructed and optimized, combining different sampling methods, training set sizes, and algorithms. Balanced sampling, conditioned Latin hypercube sampling, and FSCS consistently outperformed simple random sampling. Despite using smaller training sets and simpler RF models, FSCS‐trained models matched or surpassed the performance of those using larger data sets or more complex LGB models. SHAP analysis revealed that FSCS enhanced feature–target relationship clarity, emphasizing feature interactions and improving model interpretability. These findings highlight the potential of advanced sampling methods for not only addressing data imbalance but also providing more accurate prior information for model training, thereby enhancing reliability, accuracy, and interpretability in ML for hydrological applications.
ISSN:0043-1397
1944-7973
DOI:10.1029/2024WR039848
Fonte:ABI/INFORM Global