Revolutionizing Nursing Education: Transformative Learning and Structural Competency—An Integrative Review

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Nursing Education vol. 64, no. 11 (Nov 2025), p. 696
Autor principal: Culross, Beth
Publicado:
SLACK INCORPORATED
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3268736780
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0148-4834 
022 |a 1938-2421 
022 |a 0022-3158 
024 7 |a 10.3928/01484834-20250626-01  |2 doi 
035 |a 3268736780 
045 2 |b d20251101  |b d20251130 
084 |a 23497  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Culross, Beth 
245 1 |a Revolutionizing Nursing Education: Transformative Learning and Structural Competency—An Integrative Review 
260 |b SLACK INCORPORATED  |c Nov 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Background: Structural competency equips nurses to address health disparities by understanding social, political, and economic structures. Despite its significance, nursing education lacks standardized approaches to teaching structural competency, highlighting the need for evidence-based curricula. Method: An integrative review followed Whittemore and Knafl's framework and PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A systematic search of CINAHL, PubMed, ERIC, Embase, and Google Scholar identified 17 relevant studies. Results: Active learning methods, including simulations, community engagement, and policy advocacy, enhanced learner engagement and competency development. Conclusion: Integrating structural competency into nursing curricula through experiential and reflective learning improves awareness of systemic health inequities and strengthens advocacy skills. Future research should refine teaching strategies and develop competency-based assessments to enhance implementation and evaluation in nursing education, recognizing structural competency as both a content area and an advocacy skill. 
651 4 |a United States--US 
653 |a Nursing education 
653 |a Teaching methods 
653 |a Curricula 
653 |a Health disparities 
653 |a Subject heading schemes 
653 |a Data analysis 
653 |a Community 
653 |a Medical students 
653 |a Nurses 
653 |a Sample size 
653 |a Inclusion 
653 |a Data collection 
653 |a Talent management 
653 |a Economic conditions 
653 |a Evidence-based medicine 
653 |a Focus Groups 
653 |a Access to Health Care 
653 |a Learning Activities 
653 |a Integrated Curriculum 
653 |a Competence 
653 |a Curriculum Development 
653 |a Experiential Learning 
653 |a Curriculum Design 
653 |a Content Analysis 
653 |a Experimental Teaching 
653 |a Medical Education 
653 |a Mixed Methods Research 
653 |a Meta Analysis 
653 |a Elective Courses 
653 |a Community Resources 
653 |a Student Needs 
653 |a Information Seeking 
653 |a Grounded Theory 
653 |a Barriers 
653 |a Methods Research 
653 |a Educational Strategies 
773 0 |t Journal of Nursing Education  |g vol. 64, no. 11 (Nov 2025), p. 696 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Health & Medical Collection 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3268736780/abstract/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3268736780/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3268736780/fulltextPDF/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch