Obálka

Psychometric Evaluation of the Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation Inventory in Ecuadorian Population

Uloženo v:
Vydáno v:Inquiry vol. 62 (Jan 2025)
Hlavní autor: Oleas, Daniel
Další autoři: José Alejandro Valdevila Figueira, Santiestevan, Rocio Valdevila, Moreta-Herrera, Rodrigo, Mascialino, Guido, Rodas, Jose A
Vydáno:
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC.
Témata:
Ecuador
Measures
Reliability
Confirmatory factor analysis
Protective factors
Self esteem
Property
College students
Mental disorders
Questionnaires
Colleges & universities
Suicide
Risk assessment
University students
Validation studies
Young adults
Validity
Quantitative psychology
Suicidal ideation
Public health
Suicidal behavior
Teenagers
Suicide prevention
Prevention programs
Discriminant analysis
Hopelessness
Factor analysis
Convergent validity
Factor structure
Data collection
Ability
Risk factors
On-line přístup:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstrakt:The Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation (PANSI) inventory is a widely used measure to assess risk and protective factors associated with suicidal ideation. Despite its use in various populations, its psychometric properties have not been evaluated in Ecuador. This study examines the reliability, factorial structure, and convergent validity of the PANSI in a sample of Ecuadorian university students. A total of 702 university students completed the PANSI, the Beck Hopelessness Scale, and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to evaluate the factorial structure of the PANSI. Convergent validity was examined through Pearson correlations between PANSI subscales and external measures. Both subscales of the PANSI demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Negative Suicide Ideation: ω = 0.95; Positive Suicide Ideation: ω = 0.82). CFA supported the original 2-factor model, with adequate fit indices (RMSEA = 0.092, SRMR = 0.08, CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99). The Negative Suicide Ideation subscale correlated positively with hopelessness (r = .518, P < .001) and negatively with self-esteem (r = −.529, P < .001), while the Positive Suicide Ideation subscale correlated negatively with hopelessness (r = −.557, P < .001) and positively with self-esteem (r = .530, P < .001), supporting convergent validity. The findings indicate that the PANSI is a reliable and valid measure for assessing suicidal ideation in Ecuadorian university students, and arguably, Ecuadorian population. Its ability to capture both risk and protective factors highlights its utility in clinical and educational settings for suicide prevention efforts.
ISSN:0046-9580
1945-7243
DOI:10.1177/00469580251337665
Zdroj:ABI/INFORM Global