Buchumschlag

Development of a Cardiovascular Specialist Nurse Training Evaluation Model

Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing vol. 57, no. 1 (Jan 2026), p. 21-54
1. Verfasser: Li, Xiaofen
Weitere Verfasser: Wang, Lihong, Fan, Haizhen, Zhai, Minling, Jin, Yan, Lu, Hong
Veröffentlicht:
SLACK INCORPORATED
Schlagworte:
Beijing China
China
Nursing education
Pilot projects
Clinical medicine
Training
Feasibility
Feedback
Teachers
Nurses
Validation studies
Validity
Revisions
Knowledge
Educational Benefits
Sensitivity Training
Hospitals
Literature Reviews
Construct Validity
Competence
Rating Scales
Questionnaires
Interrater Reliability
Medical Education
Measurement Techniques
Interviews
Doctoral Degrees
Patient Education
Program Evaluation
Medical Evaluation
Correlation
Ethics
Delphi Technique
Formative Evaluation
Evaluators
Familiarity
Content Validity
Online-Zugang:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie das erste Tag hinzu!
Abstract:Background: Training programs for cardiovascular specialist nurses in China lack standardized evaluation frameworks. This study developed a structured evaluation model based on the Workplace-Based Assessment (WPBA) guided by Miller's Pyramid of clinical competence. Method: A Delphi method was employed, involving 15 cardiovascular nursing education experts who participated in two consultation rounds. Initial evaluation items were derived from literature reviews and expert group discussions. Consensus and content validity were assessed using descriptive statistics and Kendall's coefficient of concordance. Results: Experts achieved strong consensus, validating a comprehensive evaluation model comprising four integrated assessment components: theoretical knowledge examination, Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX), Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS), and Case-Based Discussion (CBD). Each assessment aligns with one level of Miller's Pyramid, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation from theoretical knowledge to clinical performance. Consensus analysis demonstrated high expert agreement and consistency across assessment criteria and clinical sites. Conclusion: This structured assessment model addresses existing gaps in advanced nursing education, offering standardized and objective evaluations of trainee competencies. This evaluation framework contributes substantially to advancing nursing education and enhancing cardiovascular health care quality through better trained specialist nurses.
ISSN:0022-0124
1938-2472
DOI:10.3928/00220124-20251029-01
Quelle:Health & Medical Collection