Development of a Cardiovascular Specialist Nurse Training Evaluation Model

Gardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing vol. 57, no. 1 (Jan 2026), p. 21-54
Autor Principal: Li, Xiaofen
Outros autores: Wang, Lihong, Fan, Haizhen, Zhai, Minling, Jin, Yan, Lu, Hong
Publicado:
SLACK INCORPORATED
Materias:
Acceso en liña:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Engadir etiqueta
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3288060221
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0022-0124 
022 |a 1938-2472 
024 7 |a 10.3928/00220124-20251029-01  |2 doi 
035 |a 3288060221 
045 2 |b d20260101  |b d20260131 
084 |a 23906  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Li, Xiaofen  |u Heart Failure & Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit 
245 1 |a Development of a Cardiovascular Specialist Nurse Training Evaluation Model 
260 |b SLACK INCORPORATED  |c Jan 2026 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Background: Training programs for cardiovascular specialist nurses in China lack standardized evaluation frameworks. This study developed a structured evaluation model based on the Workplace-Based Assessment (WPBA) guided by Miller's Pyramid of clinical competence. Method: A Delphi method was employed, involving 15 cardiovascular nursing education experts who participated in two consultation rounds. Initial evaluation items were derived from literature reviews and expert group discussions. Consensus and content validity were assessed using descriptive statistics and Kendall's coefficient of concordance. Results: Experts achieved strong consensus, validating a comprehensive evaluation model comprising four integrated assessment components: theoretical knowledge examination, Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX), Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS), and Case-Based Discussion (CBD). Each assessment aligns with one level of Miller's Pyramid, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation from theoretical knowledge to clinical performance. Consensus analysis demonstrated high expert agreement and consistency across assessment criteria and clinical sites. Conclusion: This structured assessment model addresses existing gaps in advanced nursing education, offering standardized and objective evaluations of trainee competencies. This evaluation framework contributes substantially to advancing nursing education and enhancing cardiovascular health care quality through better trained specialist nurses. 
651 4 |a Beijing China 
651 4 |a China 
653 |a Nursing education 
653 |a Pilot projects 
653 |a Clinical medicine 
653 |a Training 
653 |a Feasibility 
653 |a Feedback 
653 |a Teachers 
653 |a Nurses 
653 |a Validation studies 
653 |a Validity 
653 |a Revisions 
653 |a Knowledge 
653 |a Educational Benefits 
653 |a Sensitivity Training 
653 |a Hospitals 
653 |a Literature Reviews 
653 |a Construct Validity 
653 |a Competence 
653 |a Rating Scales 
653 |a Questionnaires 
653 |a Interrater Reliability 
653 |a Medical Education 
653 |a Measurement Techniques 
653 |a Interviews 
653 |a Doctoral Degrees 
653 |a Patient Education 
653 |a Program Evaluation 
653 |a Medical Evaluation 
653 |a Correlation 
653 |a Ethics 
653 |a Delphi Technique 
653 |a Formative Evaluation 
653 |a Evaluators 
653 |a Familiarity 
653 |a Content Validity 
700 1 |a Wang, Lihong  |u Cardiovascular Medicine Department 
700 1 |a Fan, Haizhen  |u Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit 
700 1 |a Zhai, Minling  |u Heart Failure & Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit 
700 1 |a Jin, Yan  |u Cardiovascular Medicine Department 
700 1 |a Lu, Hong  |u Nursing Department, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China. 
773 0 |t The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing  |g vol. 57, no. 1 (Jan 2026), p. 21-54 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Health & Medical Collection 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3288060221/abstract/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3288060221/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3288060221/fulltextPDF/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch