The timing and magnitude of Stroop interference and facilitation in monolinguals and bilinguals
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Bilingualism vol. 16, no. 2 (Apr 2013), p. 420-441 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | , |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1314890986 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1366-7289 | ||
| 022 | |a 1469-1841 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S1366728912000405 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 1314890986 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20130401 |b d20130430 | |
| 084 | |a 79004 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a CODERRE, EMILY L | |
| 245 | 1 | |a The timing and magnitude of Stroop interference and facilitation in monolinguals and bilinguals | |
| 260 | |b Cambridge University Press |c Apr 2013 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Executive control abilities and lexical access speed in Stroop performance were investigated in English monolinguals and two groups of bilinguals (English-Chinese and Chinese-English) in their first (L1) and second (L2) languages. Predictions were based on a bilingual cognitive advantage hypothesis, implicating cognitive control ability as the critical factor determining Stroop interference; and two bilingual lexical disadvantage hypotheses, focusing on lexical access speed. Importantly, each hypothesis predicts different response patterns in a Stroop task manipulating stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). There was evidence for a bilingual cognitive advantage, although this effect was sensitive to a number of variables including proficiency, language immersion, and script. In lexical access speed, no differences occurred between monolinguals and bilinguals in their native languages, but there was evidence for a delay in L2 processing speed relative to the L1. Overall, the data highlight the multitude of factors affecting executive control and lexical access speed in bilinguals. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] | |
| 610 | 4 | |a University of Nottingham | |
| 653 | |a Native languages | ||
| 653 | |a Monolingualism | ||
| 653 | |a Lexical access | ||
| 653 | |a Language proficiency | ||
| 653 | |a Memory | ||
| 653 | |a Hypotheses | ||
| 653 | |a Stroop task | ||
| 653 | |a Bilingualism | ||
| 653 | |a Experimental psychology | ||
| 653 | |a Phonology | ||
| 653 | |a Cognition & reasoning | ||
| 653 | |a Cognition | ||
| 653 | |a Chinese languages | ||
| 653 | |a Learning transfer | ||
| 653 | |a Data processing | ||
| 653 | |a Native language | ||
| 653 | |a Executive control | ||
| 653 | |a Asian cultural groups | ||
| 653 | |a Competence | ||
| 653 | |a Access | ||
| 653 | |a Cognitive functioning | ||
| 653 | |a Bilingual people | ||
| 653 | |a Stimulus | ||
| 653 | |a Languages | ||
| 653 | |a Language Skills | ||
| 653 | |a Executive Function | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a VAN HEUVEN, WALTER J B | |
| 700 | 1 | |a CONKLIN, KATHY | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Bilingualism |g vol. 16, no. 2 (Apr 2013), p. 420-441 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Arts & Humanities Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1314890986/abstract/embedded/J7RWLIQ9I3C9JK51?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1314890986/fulltext/embedded/J7RWLIQ9I3C9JK51?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1314890986/fulltextPDF/embedded/J7RWLIQ9I3C9JK51?source=fedsrch |