LLM-based automatic short answer grading in undergraduate medical education
Gardado en:
| Publicado en: | BMC Medical Education vol. 24 (2024), p. 1 |
|---|---|
| Autor Principal: | |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature B.V.
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en liña: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetas: |
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!
|
| Resumo: | BackgroundMultiple choice questions are heavily used in medical education assessments, but rely on recognition instead of knowledge recall. However, grading open questions is a time-intensive task for teachers. Automatic short answer grading (ASAG) has tried to fill this gap, and with the recent advent of Large Language Models (LLM), this branch has seen a new momentum.MethodsWe graded 2288 student answers from 12 undergraduate medical education courses in 3 languages using GPT-4 and Gemini 1.0 Pro.ResultsGPT-4 proposed significantly lower grades than the human evaluator, but reached low rates of false positives. The grades of Gemini 1.0 Pro were not significantly different from the teachers’. Both LLMs reached a moderate agreement with human grades, and a high precision for GPT-4 among answers considered fully correct. A consistent grading behavior could be determined for high-quality keys. A weak correlation was found wrt. the length or language of student answers. There is a risk of bias if the LLM knows the human grade a priori.ConclusionsLLM-based ASAG applied to medical education still requires human oversight, but time can be spared on the edge cases, allowing teachers to focus on the middle ones. For Bachelor-level medical education questions, the training knowledge of LLMs seems to be sufficient, fine-tuning is thus not necessary. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1472-6920 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12909-024-06026-5 |
| Fonte: | Healthcare Administration Database |